Close
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 56
  1. #21
    Freeform Funkafied funkfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    2,846

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moviestar View Post
    Another good example is pro choice, they support the right for people to choose for themselves. They aren't going to tell you what to do, and it doesn't mean they are telling people to abort babies.
    So - is THAT why the pro-choice group NOW and others were beating up on CBS for airing the Tim Tebow ad?
    What part of pro-choice do you not comprehend?
    The part where folks that would advocate pro-choice to choose life are denigrated ridiculed and protested against?
    Or the part that makes it obvious to all but the brainwashed that pro-choice really means pro-abortion?

    http://www.now.org/issues/media/cbs10.html

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playof...ory?id=4891116

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_436187.html

    Now back to our regularly scheduled program...
    NRA Benefactor Member
    "If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." Samuel Adams
    Feedback and Disclaimer

  2. #22
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Abortion is a terrible example to use, as it is not a constitutional right.

  3. #23
    Freeform Funkafied funkfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    2,846

    Default

    No - not a constitutional right - but does demonstrate that people (legislatively minded groups, really) name their organizations with the GP in mind.
    You must understand - in all things of importance, it is a battle for the hearts AND minds.
    If the mind hears "Illegal guns" then "Heck yeah - I'm for controlling that!". Just as if the mind hears "pro-choice" vs "pro-abortion".
    NRA Benefactor Member
    "If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." Samuel Adams
    Feedback and Disclaimer

  4. #24
    Gong Shooter SU405's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Lafayette
    Posts
    376

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sniper7 View Post
    Your constitutional rights are being stepped on and YOU want to look at the other side. grow a pair.

    I knew I liked you for some reason or another.


  5. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bailey CO
    Posts
    6,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sniper7 View Post
    there are no two sides to the story. it is plain and simple, written in the constitution that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. where in that do you read anything about a second side, compromise, having to register, having to run a background check or any other bullshit.
    I should be able to walk into a gun shop, tell them i want to buy "that" gun, pay, and walk out...none of the other nonsense that goes on.

    Your constitutional rights are being stepped on and YOU want to look at the other side. grow a pair.

    +1 on that.. any deviation is against my religion.

  6. #26
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Metro
    Posts
    136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart View Post
    Abortion is a terrible example to use, as it is not a constitutional right.
    Actually, it is a constitutional right, according to the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade. They somehow 'discovered' that right within the 4th amendment. You may disagree with the court, but it has been the law of the land for decades.

  7. #27
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Well, I don't want to get into the abortion issue either way, as I don't think it is an appropriate parallel to guns. I guess that was the point I was making.

    Regardless, it doesn't matter how things are perceived in the battle over abortion, because that has nothing to do with guns and is totally irrelevant. I guess that's what I'm trying to say.

  8. #28
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Metro
    Posts
    136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart View Post
    Well, I don't want to get into the abortion issue either way, as I don't think it is an appropriate parallel to guns. I guess that was the point I was making.

    Regardless, it doesn't matter how things are perceived in the battle over abortion, because that has nothing to do with guns and is totally irrelevant. I guess that's what I'm trying to say.
    Agree completely, let's not bring abortion into this discussion. It has nothing to do with guns.

  9. #29
    Freeform Funkafied funkfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    2,846

    Default

    Agreed.
    Yet I stand by my post: MAIG is anti-gun.
    NRA Benefactor Member
    "If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." Samuel Adams
    Feedback and Disclaimer

  10. #30
    Machine Gunner SAnd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    1,625

    Default No "middle ground"

    Moviestar says "yes there is a middle ground".

    The big problem with the "middle ground" or compromise is assumes that the opposition will honor a compromise. The words incrementalism, progressive and slippery slope come to mind.

    I compromised in 1934 with the National Firearms Act .

    I compromised in 1968 with the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 and the Gun Control Act of 1968.

    I compromised in1986 with the Firearms Owner's Protection Act.

    I compromised in 1993 with the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act.

    I compromised in 1994 with the Assault Weapons Ban which fortunately self repealed in 2004.

    I'm not inclined to compromise and meet someone half way when they come back and want to take more time after time after time. They keep moving the middle ground.

    No more. You want them come and get them.

    From my Cold Dead Hands.
    Steve A.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •