Close
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11
    Machine Gunner Hound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    1,764

    Default

    I volunteer to help them dispose of as much as I can.......... For free even.
    My life working is only preparation for my life as a hermit.

    Feedback https://www.ar-15.co/threads/99005-Hound

  2. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hound View Post
    I volunteer to help them dispose of as much as I can.......... For free even.
    Amen!!!! sign me up.. If they drop a pallet of steel core I am sure someone around here will let us have some fun..

  3. #13
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,566

    Default

    Mmmm .... if it's banned by international treaty then you're probably talking about things like chemical weapons. It costs a lot to build furnaces capable of destroying mustard and VX. We had tons of that stuff in storage; we've been trying to get rid of it for decades and it has cost a lot to burn what we could. Ammo for atomic artillery is also banned by treaty and pretty darn expensive to get rid of. Other things like artillery/tank rounds and mortars for WW2 and Korean War-era munitions just aren't going to be sold to the public.

  4. #14
    High Power Shooter Rabid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Centennial
    Posts
    967

    Default

    I posted a link about this a while ago, i cant remember the exact details but it is not just small arms munitions. It is some BS excuse about it taking more money to catalog it then destroy it. No it is not about non-green/lead core ammo we have been using steel since WW2 and our troops, believe it or not, still use ammo that old.
    Any way thank Clinton for not allowing the small arms ammo to be sold to the public.

  5. #15
    GLOCK HOOKER hurley842002's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    8,021

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter View Post
    Mmmm .... if it's banned by international treaty then you're probably talking about things like chemical weapons. It costs a lot to build furnaces capable of destroying mustard and VX. We had tons of that stuff in storage; we've been trying to get rid of it for decades and it has cost a lot to burn what we could. Ammo for atomic artillery is also banned by treaty and pretty darn expensive to get rid of. Other things like artillery/tank rounds and mortars for WW2 and Korean War-era munitions just aren't going to be sold to the public.
    Probably a more viable theory, think Pueblo chemical Depot.

  6. #16
    IN MEMORIUM
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The RUST Belt (Peoria, Illinois)
    Posts
    7,319

    Default

    Surely a lot of local police departments would be glad to get some of the small arms ammo if compatible with their firearms.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •