Close
Page 17 of 25 FirstFirst ... 71213141516171819202122 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 243
  1. #161
    Gives a sh!t; pretends he doesn't HoneyBadger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    C-Springs again! :)
    Posts
    14,839
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cstone View Post
    Is that one of Bundy's dead cattle?? WHY ARE YOU BEATING IT?!
    My Feedback

    "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat

    "I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
    ― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind

  2. #162
    .
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Florissant
    Posts
    4,380

    Default

    http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-sta...cart_big-photo
    Cliven Bundy, the Nevada rancher who touched off one armed showdown with federal authorities and applauded another started in Oregon by his sons, was arrested late Wednesday at Portland International Airport and faces federal charges related to the 2014 standoff at his ranch.

    Bundy, 74, was booked into the downtown Multnomah County jail at 10:54 p.m.

    He faces a conspiracy charge to interfere with a federal officer -- the same charge lodged against two of his sons, Ammon and Ryan, for their role in the Jan. 2 takeover of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Burns. He also faces weapons charges.

  3. #163
    Gong Shooter Rumline's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    430

    Default

    Bundy is no hero of mine but WTF does "conspiracy to interfere with an officer" consist of? Two people talking about doing something that prevents a LEO from doing something?

  4. #164
    Machine Gunner Martinjmpr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Pueblo
    Posts
    2,112

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rumline View Post
    Bundy is no hero of mine but WTF does "conspiracy to interfere with an officer" consist of? Two people talking about doing something that prevents a LEO from doing something?
    The standoff from 2014. Did you think the feds had forgotten about that? Nope they were just biding their time.
    Martin

    If you love your freedom, thank a veteran. If you love to party, thank the Beastie Boys. They fought for that right.

  5. #165
    Gong Shooter Rumline's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    430

    Default

    IANAL but that seemed like a lot more than just conspiracy though.

    I was asking about in general...what is considered to be "conspiracy to interfere with an officer"?

  6. #166
    Machine Gunner Martinjmpr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Pueblo
    Posts
    2,112

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rumline View Post
    IANAL but that seemed like a lot more than just conspiracy though.

    I was asking about in general...what is considered to be "conspiracy to interfere with an officer"?
    I would guess it's probably 18 USC section 372:

    18 U.S. Code § 372

    If two or more persons in any State, Territory, Possession, or District conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof, or to induce by like means any officer of the United States to leave the place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties, each of such persons shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six years, or both.
    If you recall the BLM went to Bundy's ranch to seize the cattle that were illegally grazing there. Bundy and others then showed up, armed, and forced the feds to back off. That would seem to meet all of the requirements of the charge.

    I would also guess that there will actually be a laundry list of other charges as well including:

    18 USC Section 231, civil disorders,
    18 U.S. Code § 930 - Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facilities
    18 U.S. Code § 1361 - Malicious Mischeif (Government property or contracts)
    18 U.S. Code § 1503 - Influencing or injuring officer or juror generally

    And that's what I could pull up just in a cursory search of 18 USC (the criminal portion of Federal statutes.) There's probably a long list of state charges they could face as well - intimidation of a public official, obstruction of justice, etc.
    Martin

    If you love your freedom, thank a veteran. If you love to party, thank the Beastie Boys. They fought for that right.

  7. #167
    a cool, fancy title hollohas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,072

    Default

    Rumors coming out now that the FBI may be readying dozens of warrants for folks that were present at Bundy Ranch. Also, sounds like in addition to Cliven Bundy getting arrested, a few of the folks that have been with him since the ranch standoff (Blaine Cooper, and two other Bundy "body guards) were picked up by the FBI at separate locations Wednesday.

    Might be getting ready to see a wide net cast...

  8. #168
    Gong Shooter Rumline's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    430

    Default

    I guess I'm still hung up on the "conspire to" part of it. Wouldn't an example of that being Bundy and his son talking to each other about blocking BLM from seizing the cattle? Maybe that's the clearest-cut thing they could charge him with but it seems pretty small fry, relatively speaking.
    Last edited by Rumline; 02-11-2016 at 17:10.

  9. #169
    Machine Gunner Martinjmpr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Pueblo
    Posts
    2,112

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rumline View Post
    I guess I'm still hung up on the "conspire to" part of it. Wouldn't an example of that being Bundy and his son talking to each other about blocking BLM from seizing the cattle? Maybe that's the clearest-cut thing they could charge him with but it seems pretty small fry, relatively speaking.
    Bundy and a whole bunch of other people (hundreds, IIRC) showed up with a common purpose of preventing the BLM officials from executing their warrants to seize cattle and remove them from Bundy's illegal operation.

    A conspiracy requires two elements, an agreement between two or more people to commit a criminal act, and at least one overt act in furtherance of that agreement.

    The "agreement" part can be shown by actions, it need not be shown by words (though there are plenty of both, as evidenced by the various video of the Nevada incident and public statements made by Bundy and others that they intended to resist the authority of the BLM. That right there is sufficient to provide all the elements needed to convict him of that charge. And as I posted earlier, there are sure to be lots of other charges as well.
    Martin

    If you love your freedom, thank a veteran. If you love to party, thank the Beastie Boys. They fought for that right.

  10. #170
    a cool, fancy title hollohas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,072

    Default

    I was not aware of the particular law before it was posted here, but it's stupid.

    The papers have been filed. I'll post the link in a second, but here's one of the charges. Charging him for "obsturcting commerce" for taking his cattle back is bogus. How can an impounded property be considered an interchange of goods for trade? Nothing about that was "commerce".


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •