Who do we like for SCOTUS?

[Rumline]

Thanks for the update. I'm feeling like Erni and I can't bear to read the hyperventilating WaPoo or other clearly liberal media to see what is going on. Even Fox News had some liberal on there spouting off about how this is the end of the republican party.

[Bailey Guns]

What struck me as odd about Ford's testimony is she never said that she told the person who assaulted her to stop nor did she say "no", etc. If she did I missed it. Now that doesn't give the person permission by any means...but it strikes me as odd. Every sex assault I ever investigated the victim said they told the suspect to stop...unless they were incapacitated.

She also speaks like a 16 year old valley girl and comes across to me as very naive and fragile and not very intelligent for someone who's a doctor.

The Democrat senators are predictably pathetic and dishonest.

[Bailey Guns]

I also noticed she emphasized a few points that people were questioning before. She's been well prepared, no doubt.

[Skip]

What struck me as odd about Ford's testimony is she never said that she told the person who assaulted her to stop nor did she say "no", etc. If she did I missed it. Now that doesn't give the person permission by any means...but it strikes me as odd. Every sex assault I ever investigated the victim said they told the suspect to stop...unless they were incapacitated.

She also speaks like a 16 year old valley girl and comes across to me as very naive and fragile and not very intelligent for someone who's a doctor.

The Democrat senators are predictably pathetic and dishonest.

She claims Kavanaugh covered her mouth to muffle her screams and that there was music playing in the room. She says Kavanaugh held her down with the weight of his body on a bed while he tried to remove her clothes.

This has been dissected a bit on the socials because it creates a nuance for witness statements (e.g. being there but hearing/seeing nothing). To which it's been pointed out the witnesses didn't even put Kavanaugh at ANY party with Ford.

I think you are right about the preparation and I think the fill in of these critical details was well rehearsed. The testimony was very detailed about the emotional aspects of the alleged assault but not the details that would substantiate Ford's claim.

---

Sheila Jackson Lee is caught on camera handing a note to Bromwich (second Ford counsel)... Speculation that it was questioning info.

(I can't embed Twitter vids, but you can watch at link)

https://twitter.com/therealcornett/s...57993246838789

[Irving]

I think you are right about the preparation and I think the fill in of these critical details was well rehearsed. The testimony was very detailed about the emotional aspects of the alleged assault but not the details that would substantiate Ford's claim.

I only heard some at the beginning, and some just before the break, but this is what struck me the most. I get that there is some story telling element to all this, but without trying to sound callous, how important is it that anyone knows how it affected Ford? It seems to me that the real question is whether or not it happened.

[hollohas]

This is maddening. The media/Dems, etc think it's a'ok to destroy a good man over something that may, or more likely may not have, happened when he was a boy. Makes me sick.

As for her obvious BS. I partied a lot in HS. And I can remember every house we partied at. The notion that she "remembers" in such great detail what "happened" but can't remember where it happened is horseshit.

Listening to Dem congressmen complain about how sad it is that the country has become so uncivilized and mean, when they are the worst offenders as they destroy a good man with ZERO evidence and with political motives, puts my blood pressure through the roof.

This Republic is in major trouble...

[SamuraiCO]

No other girls at the same party that had been assaulted at the same party have come forward. Her story is just that, a story. No evidence. Just the Dem machine in full retard mode to kill this nomination, hopefully take the senate and have control on the next SCOTUS nomination.

[Skip]

I only heard some at the beginning, and some just before the break, but this is what struck me the most. I get that there is some story telling element to all this, but without trying to sound callous, how important is it that anyone knows how it affected Ford? It seems to me that the real question is whether or not it happened.

This seems to be the dividing line between both camps.

You have Libs saying that her emotional testimony creates credibility but then Conservatives looking at the cold facts and not able to find anything this morning that increased Ford's credibility.

There seems to be a strong feeling on the Left that her emotion presents a very real account that doesn't require any validation.

---

Ford has just claimed Leland (Ingram) Keyser (one of her best friends and named witnesses) has mental issues in response why Keyser can't corroborate any of her claims.

---

Can't even consistently name the year between all statements made in the last two months...

Christine Blasey Ford admitted under oath that she crossed out the word "early" in her August 7th post-polygraph notes.
She couldn't say for certain on August 7th the Kavanaugh incident happened in the "early" 1980's but now she knows it happened in 1982? #KavanaughHearings

https://twitter.com/infolibnews/stat...77987468828674

[Skip]

[davsel]

My 14yo writes better notes than that.
Ford is a useful idiot.