It sounds like it was just shear failure, that thrown prop blade just tossed around the plane so sharply that it overstressed the prop hub on the other side, and then the fuselage buckled.
It sounds like it was just shear failure, that thrown prop blade just tossed around the plane so sharply that it overstressed the prop hub on the other side, and then the fuselage buckled.
Wow. That's just awful.
Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
-Me
I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
-Also Me
The report was quite an infuriating piece to read regarding how sloppy Warner Robins record keeping and processes were.
Sayonara
If the disintegrating propeller, cuts the control lines, catastrophic failure can occur.
Just my 2 cents.
"Each engine is equipped with a Hamilton Standard, four-blade, electro-hydromatic, full-feathering, reversible-pitch propeller. The propeller operates as a controllable-pitch propeller for throttle settings below flight idle and as a constant-speed propeller for throttle settings of flight idle or above. The major components of the propeller system are the propeller assembly, the synchrophasing system, the control system, and the anti-icing and deicing system"
https://info.publicintelligence.net/USNavy-C130T.pdf
It didn't cut the control lines, it cut into the longeron, a structural assembly that goes along the length of the aircraft fuselage. Essentially, these props cut the plane's spine.
What a terrible way to go.
RATATATATATATATATATATABLAM
If there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to buy a gun, there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to vote.
For legal reasons, that's a joke.
Has anyone actually commanded a C-130 as PIC in this thread?