Right to shoot at drones

[Grant H.]

Yeah, a kite or Estes rocket with a 4K camera. Apparently you folks have something to hide.

It wasn't 4k (didn't exist, shit, I don't think HD did either), but I had a model rocket with a camera on it back in the day.

Not really apples to apples, but it's still the point.

Honestly, a kite would be even easier than a quad... You don't have to have the wireless video transmission.... You can use the rope to run a data/video cable.


__________________________________________________ ___

Back to the real topic of the thread...


The simple answer here is that there is new tech that isn't going away, and as long as there is a human element involved, there are going to be douche bags with said tech that will do the douche baggery...

I have a sneaking suspicion that most that shoot a drone over their property are going to be red-flagged pretty quick anymore.

1. Discharging a firearm in a neighborhood is verboten everywhere that I know of (city limits thing)
2. Announcing that you have firearms to douche bags that just lost their $2k toy, why wouldn't they be vindictive and get your guns confiscated for a year...
3. Likely going to get the police involved... (revert back to #1)... May not even be the drone the owner...

While some of these cases may appear to go the way of the shooter, the reality of the situation is likely to be a very negative thing for a pro-2A person shooting a drone out of the sky...