Close
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Keyboard Operation Specialist FoxtArt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Montrose
    Posts
    2,782

    Default

    The decision essentially complies with the 11th amendment as written -granted, it is mostly interpreted to the Federal courts, but it's an obvious extension to prohibit suits in foreign states too.

    "The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State."
    It's not even a conservative or liberal issue imho. People are just making headlines for clicks.

  2. #2
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OxArt View Post
    The decision essentially complies with the 11th amendment as written -granted, it is mostly interpreted to the Federal courts, but it's an obvious extension to prohibit suits in foreign states too.

    It's not even a conservative or liberal issue imho. People are just making headlines for clicks.
    It's making headlines because it's a problem for the Left when you consider how many ground breaking decisions have been forced on the American people via the Judiciary.

    Imagine a gay marriage decision based on the 10th?
    An abortion decision that applies the 14th?


    And an honest reading of 2A, without the dead weight of previous bad decisions, what get us what? Even Scalia's opinion on Heller creates bad precedent with "not unlimited" on a civil right that SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
    Always eat the vegans first

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •