Close
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32
  1. #11
    High Power Shooter FromMyColdDeadHand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    814

    Default

    This is just a former injunction ruling, but I think it provides well for us. I think it would be able to be cited in the lawsuits against the Colorado law, especially in regards to getting some kind of preliminary injunction relief. Also votes well for a final decision on The whole law.
    I'll stop buying black rifles when my wife stops buying black shoes.

  2. #12
    High Power Shooter FromMyColdDeadHand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    814

    Default

    Washington gun law just had a video about this. I guess the 10th circuit refused to hear it on bunk, which means that this ruling stands. I don’t know if this was just a pulmonary injunction or that it was found that winning periods were unconstitutional as a final ruling? It definitely seems like it would put Colorado’s law into trouble.
    I'll stop buying black rifles when my wife stops buying black shoes.

  3. #13
    Grand Master Know It All Hummer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    North of Ward in Subaru County
    Posts
    2,624

    Default

    Waiting periods are just another assault on our constitution and American freedoms by the new marxist democrats. More virtue signaling for their low morals voters. Can we please have a ruling to find the ban on plastic grocery bags unconstitutional? Most everyone used for them for trash but now end up buying other plastic bags to replace them.

  4. #14
    COAR SpecOps Team Leader theGinsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Colo Spr
    Posts
    22,037
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Firearm Purchase Waiting Periods (in CO, 3-day waiting period): A Right delayed is a Right denied.

    We all know what this and all of the other anti-2A laws are, "death by 1000 cuts". Even if these restrictions are taken to court (at a tremendous cost to those seeking to remove the infringements), and *if* the plaintiffs win, the State can take months to re-instate the Rights ("It's going to take us time to revise our procedures") - and usually no action is taken until after they lose on appeal (even more time and money involved). You and I challenging these restrictions could very well bankrupt us, even with assistance from national gun rights organizations. But the state never has to worry about where the money to fight these repugnant laws will come from - they just tax the peasants citizens more.

    The State knows exactly what they're doing and the possibility of losing in the courts - but they get their way for a time. They also know that when cases go before SCOTUS, the decisions are usually quite narrow in nature instead of addressing all potential aspects of state authority on the matter. This just leaves the door open wide for the states to keep pulling these shenanigans over and over.

    There have been a few Federal District decisions (and is currently awaiting SCOTUS decision) ruling against magazine capacity restrictions, yet since July, 2013 CO has maintained a 15-round capacity limit which prevents you and I from purchasing certain magazines, and in some cases, some firearms.

    SCOTUS needs to set a hard, firm and clear definition for what "infringement" means pertaining to firearms, possession, magazines, other accessories, and ammunition and States need to be forced to comply immediately with those decisions. Instead, SCOTUS continues to pick one cherry off of the tree at a time.
    Ginsue - Admin
    Proud Infidel Since 1965

    "You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020

    Ginsue's Feedback

  5. #15
    Grand Master Know It All eddiememphis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    3,212

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hummer View Post
    Can we please have a ruling to find the ban on plastic grocery bags unconstitutional? Most everyone used for them for trash but now end up buying other plastic bags to replace them.
    The Constitution doesn’t protect grocery bags.

    The bans are regulatory policy, not a rights issue. US courts have repeatedly upheld plastic bag bans, citing they are within the authority of the government's legitimate interest.

  6. #16
    High Power Shooter FromMyColdDeadHand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    814

    Default

    The Washington Gun Law video



    So, is it as ‘simple’ as filing a court case? Or are there enough differences ??? Between their and our law?
    I'll stop buying black rifles when my wife stops buying black shoes.

  7. #17
    COAR SpecOps Team Leader theGinsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Colo Spr
    Posts
    22,037
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand View Post
    So, is it as ‘simple’ as filing a court case? Or are there enough differences ??? Between their and our law?
    If we can identify a firearm law knowledgeable attorney willing to take on the case here in CO, I'd be willing to be the plaintiff. (Probably going to need to financial support to pay legal costs to make it happen too).
    Ginsue - Admin
    Proud Infidel Since 1965

    "You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020

    Ginsue's Feedback

  8. #18
    Range Boss TEAMRICO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Fountain/Widefield/Security
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Then all products should be banned from using plastic packaging……but just in the states that ban bags.
    When does that happen next?
    NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle and Shotgun Instructor.
    NRA Range Safety Officer for Local Shoot Events. Contact Me. POST Certified.

    KING: [Watching the ambush party leave into the jungle] I'm glad I ain't going with them. Somewhere out there is the beast and he hungry tonight.
    Platoon 1986
    NO RANGE FOR YOU!!!.....NEXT!!!

  9. #19
    Hello, my name is: KNOWN Gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Parker
    Posts
    4,639

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by theGinsue View Post
    If we can identify a firearm law knowledgeable attorney willing to take on the case here in CO, I'd be willing to be the plaintiff. (Probably going to need to financial support to pay legal costs to make it happen too).
    Man I?d love to the plantiff in a case against polis and the state.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  10. #20
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,959

    Default

    10th Circuit covers Colorado, Wyoming, New Mexico, Kansas, Oklahoma and Utah.
    Firearm transfer Waiting Periods in these states are dead with this ruling.
    If the Appeals Court denied NM’s petition SCOTUS is certain to deny it as well.
    It’s dead Jim
    Last edited by BPTactical; 12-27-2025 at 15:09.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •