You've never heard the term "shootout" used for any other setting besides violence with a firearm? I sure have.
You've never heard the term "shootout" used for any other setting besides violence with a firearm? I sure have.
I suprised no one has changed the subject in this thread yet. Damnit, now I can't remember, who has the avatar of the texas A&M girl in a bikini bottom kneeling down in the water? Didn't he make that picture bigger?
If you make something idiot proof, someone will make a better idiot... Forget youth, what we need is a fountain of smart. There are no stupid questions, just a lot of inquisitive idiots.Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful. It's the transition that's troublesome. --Isaac AsimovLike, where's spyder been? That guy was like, totally cool and stuff. - foxtrot
OK, I will go along with you guys on this.
HOWEVER
in as much as Mr Reese has threatened deadly force, I believe he should be locked up and sentenced for attempted murder in the 1st.
IF
Mr Sasso had Shot The jackass dead in the street would the Threatening message have been justifiable defense?
Let's pretend we are all adults, in a tense situation you do not mention shootouts or guns or firing on someone in any way shape or form.
this isn't about a political message, this is about a sensationalist trying to up himself and pull pity in the name of political persecution when in fact he is guilty of immaturity and communicating a threat.
Call me on the phone and threaten me?
Next time I See you it's 2 center-Mass, no questions.
"I Swear officer, he reached in his coat for something. He had recently threatened to shoot me."
This isn't a fucking game.
great, so we've gone from "protecting and serving" to "avoiding liability issues"
The sheriff would not have been liable. The Supreme Court of the United States has said so.
Besides, when was the last time you heard of a CHP holder making threats and attacking someone with their firearm?
I'd like to hear the specific threat. If he explicitly threatened violence or bodily harm, that's one thing.
Right now I'm inclined to believe that the "victim" heard the word shoot and immediatley went running to restraining orders Я us while dialing the sheriff.
Now I could be wrong, but I'm giving the guy the benefit of the doubt.
Y'know, that pesky "innocent until proven guilty" thing and all.
No I didn't ... it wasn't linked* and only a couple of clips posted.
*Actually it may have been linked but I have a site blocking extension running to block ALL Righthaven related web sites as I don't want to get sued for quoting one (nor do I want to contribute to any of them getting any traffic ... they should all go out of business).
Modern liberalism is based on the idea that reality is obligated to conform to one's beliefs because; "I have the right to believe whatever I want".
"Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen.
-Friedrich Nietzsche
"Every time something really bad happens, people cry out for safety, and the government answers by taking rights away from good people."
-Penn Jillette
A World Without Guns <- Great Read!
well call me crazy, but I am pretty sure there had to be some validity to the threat that was RECORDED on Sasso's voice mail for the sheriff to go yank a CHP.
I would like to think the sheriff wouldn't do that had the threat been "political Shootout" or "Media Shootout."
I honestly believe a threat was made and we will have to wait and see.
but I know that the whole MLK Thing has been a controversial media stunt from the word go. I Suspect that this is only more of the same except that in this case its backfired.
anyone else notice that DP Titled it:
"Weld sheriff suspends gun permit of Greeley school member broadcasting anti-MLK message"
Instead of
"Weld sheriff suspends gun permit of Greeley school member Threatening Competitor."
Left handed spin sucking people in again.
byte has highlighted the real reason the guy is being persecuted.