For all you 3rd Party Zealots

[Goodburbon]

The republican party won't stand up to fix the problems. We're going to have to wait until the people do. As long as the people think that voting for one of those two parties will make a difference, we'll continue along this path.

[HoneyBadger]

The republican party won't stand up to fix the problems. We're going to have to wait until the people do. As long as the people think that voting for one of those two parties will make a difference, we'll continue along this path.

Yup.

[bryjcom]

Voting for Romney is equivalent to kicking the can down the road.

[xring]

The democrats and republicans relationship is so symbiotic that a vote for one is a vote for the other. Neither red or blue wings of Team TRP will protect our rights as defined by the Constitution or balance the budget. I will however support anyone who voted against the NDAA regardless of party affiliation.CO 1 Rep. Diana Louise DeGette Democratic Nay
2 Rep. Jared Polis Democratic NayCO 3 Rep. Scott R. Tipton Republican NayCO 4 Rep. Cory Gardner Republican YeaCO 5 Rep. Douglas L. ‘Doug’ Lamborn Republican YeaCO 6 Rep. Michael ‘Mike’ Coffman Republican NayCO 7 Rep. Ed Perlmutter Democratic Yea

[Ronin13]

Voting for Romney is equivalent to kicking the can down the road.

As opposed to voting for Obama (or anyone else which I equate as the same thing) is like cutting yourself... a lot.

[Aloha_Shooter]

Voting for Romney is equivalent to kicking the can down the road.

Voting for a third party this year is like voting for Obama which is equivalent to taking that can and repeatedly smashing yourself in the face with it.

A lot of extreme statements about Romney here but I ask you this: do you honestly think Romney would have appointed Eric Holder as Attorney General? Do you think he would have appointed Elena Kagan or Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court? Do you think he would have completely ignored Congress and claimed he was making recess appointments despite Congress being in session? Are you saying he would have revived negotiations with the UN to pass their Arms Trade Treaty? Are you claiming he would have appointed a radical environmentalist to head the EPA and allowed them to pass extensive intrusive "regulations" without any Congressional review?

There's a lot I don't like about what the GOP has done but they are NOT the same as the Democrats and anyone that says they are is equivalent to one of Lenin's "useful idiots".

[xring]

Voting for a third party this year is like voting for Obama which is equivalent to taking that can and repeatedly smashing yourself in the face with it.

A lot of extreme statements about Romney here but I ask you this: do you honestly think Romney would have appointed Eric Holder as Attorney General? Do you think he would have appointed Elena Kagan or Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court? Do you think he would have completely ignored Congress and claimed he was making recess appointments despite Congress being in session? Are you saying he would have revived negotiations with the UN to pass their Arms Trade Treaty? Are you claiming he would have appointed a radical environmentalist to head the EPA and allowed them to pass extensive intrusive "regulations" without any Congressional review?

There's a lot I don't like about what the GOP has done but they are NOT the same as the Democrats and anyone that says they are is equivalent to one of Lenin's "useful idiots".

I will not vote with fear as a driver anymore too old, too tired. Im going to vote for somone who supports the Constitution and balancing the budget.

[osok-308]

... because Obama has paid SO much attention to his Constitutional duty to seek advice and consent from the Senate and Eric Holder didn't try to use Fast and Furious to create an inflammatory case to invoke gun control and the Obama Administration ISN'T trying to pass the UN Arms Trade Treaty after installing a Supreme Court Justice who thinks it's right and proper to look at what foreign governments and treaties are doing rather than historical Constitutional precedent ..

Agreed.

Truth is, I would love for the candidate who best exemplifies the Constitution that this great nation was founded upon. However, at this present time, no candidate who has a chance to win fits this description. There is a lot to lose this election, I am a realist and I will vote for whoever has the best chance to beat the socialist we currently have. I hope Rand Paul runs for president soon.

[jerrymrc]

Agreed.

Truth is, I would love for the candidate who best exemplifies the Constitution that this great nation was founded upon. However, at this present time, no candidate who has a chance to win fits this description. There is a lot to lose this election, I am a realist and I will vote for whoever has the best chance to beat the socialist we currently have. I hope Rand Paul runs for president soon.

And I agree as well. I hate both of them. But the current one has to go at any cost.

So we get the so-so whatever light. The bottom line as far as it looks to me is that if we get another 4 years of the current one nothing may ever be able to be turned back.

Just my thought on the subject.

[Fentonite]

...The bottom line as far as it looks to me is that if we get another 4 years of the current one nothing may ever be able to be turned back.

yup. As if all his republic-squashing so far isn't bad enough, he's already basically admitted that once he's re-elected, the brakes come off, and that's when he'll destroy us for good. It's time to use our brains, be logical, and vote with a purpose, not emotional fancy.