Close
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 54
  1. #21
    Machine Gunner Teufelhund's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Elizabeth
    Posts
    1,711

    Default

    It is a non-issue. It's also despicable how the Obama campaign has run with this.

    Sesame Street urges Obama campaign to drop Big Bird ad
    "America is at that awkward stage: It's too late to work within the system, and too early to shoot the bastards."
    -Claire Wolfe

    "I got a shotgun, rifle, and a four-wheel drive, and a country boy can survive."
    -Hank Williams Jr.

    Feedback

  2. #22
    Sits like a bitch
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Unincorporated Douglas County
    Posts
    3,527

    Default

    You guy are just slurping up this spoon fed political bullshit. You really think PBS funding is an important issue?

    "* PBS stated in its press release on Thursday that government funding to PBS entails just "one one-hundredth of one percent" of the annual federal budget, and quoted a 2011 poll by Hart Research and American Viewpoint that stated that 69 percent of Americans oppose cutting government funding to PBS. "

    Boy that will solve all our problems. Wake up this is just another "wedge issue" to get people arguing about. We have a lot bigger fish to fry.
    If your post count is higher than your round count, you are a troll.

  3. #23
    Grand Master Know It All hatidua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    boulder
    Posts
    4,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asmotao View Post
    If you like PBS then donate.

    I shouldn't be forced to pay for your viewing habits.
    I feel the same way about public school: Got kids = YOU pay to educate them. I don't have kids and don't feel like I should have to pay taxes to cover schooling the neighbors rug rats.

  4. #24
    Machine Gunner merl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    longmont
    Posts
    1,802

    Default

    I feel the same way about public school: Got kids = YOU pay to educate them. I don't have kids and don't feel like I should have to pay taxes to cover schooling the neighbors rug rats.
    This one is different.
    The laws and institutions in this country are built assuming you are going to have children, because most do.
    I wont have children but I wont bitch 'too much' about paying for schools. there is some good to them and those little rugrats are going to have to keep the country running when I retire.
    Should the bulk cost be carried by the parents, yeah, but feel free to look at the lady who glued her kids hands to the wall. She isn't paying a damn thing. Those are 5 kids that are going to be a burden to everyone their entire lives. I'll pay the taxes and bitch a little bit for the (tiny) chance that maybe one of them will get it in school & not be a burden. I'd also vote for anyone who would sterilize her.

    That said, Vote no on 3A. An increase just passed 4 damn years ago.

  5. #25
    Grand Master Know It All Sharpienads's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    3,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Delfuego View Post
    You guy are just slurping up this spoon fed political bullshit. You really think PBS funding is an important issue?

    "* PBS stated in its press release on Thursday that government funding to PBS entails just "one one-hundredth of one percent" of the annual federal budget, and quoted a 2011 poll by Hart Research and American Viewpoint that stated that 69 percent of Americans oppose cutting government funding to PBS. "

    Boy that will solve all our problems. Wake up this is just another "wedge issue" to get people arguing about. We have a lot bigger fish to fry.
    Yes. It is an extremely important issue. It's the principle. I don't care how much money it is.
    Kyle

    Girlscouts? Hmmm, I don't know... I think it's kinda dangerous to teach young girls self esteem and leadership skills.

  6. #26
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    denver
    Posts
    1,834

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sharpienads View Post
    Yes. It is an extremely important issue. It's the principle. I don't care how much money it is.
    correct. yes, we need to make big cuts all over the place to fix the budget, but one reason the budget is so messed up is because our government spends money on everything, including stuff they have no business spending money on. it is certainly the principle.

  7. #27
    Paper Hunter loveski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Delfuego View Post
    You guy are just slurping up this spoon fed political bullshit. You really think PBS funding is an important issue?

    "* PBS stated in its press release on Thursday that government funding to PBS entails just "one one-hundredth of one percent" of the annual federal budget, and quoted a 2011 poll by Hart Research and American Viewpoint that stated that 69 percent of Americans oppose cutting government funding to PBS. "

    Boy that will solve all our problems. Wake up this is just another "wedge issue" to get people arguing about. We have a lot bigger fish to fry.
    Obviously cutting PBS funding is not going to solve our nations financial issues, if you have half a brain you know that. It's the principle we're talking about. In reality, cutting govt. funding to PBS is .012% of the Natl. budget. I agree, it's a small portion. However, if you make similar cuts to a variety of programs, say 200 programs total, you have now cut 2.4% off the natl. budget. This may seem like a small number. But over ten or twenty years this adds up to trillions in savings. Unfortunately, most people like you will just read .012% and disregard it as a waste of time.

  8. #28
    CO-AR's Secret Jedi roberth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elk City, Oklahoma
    Posts
    10,501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sharpienads View Post
    Yes. It is an extremely important issue. It's the principle. I don't care how much money it is.
    Thank you.

    Michael Brown is talking about this topic right now on 630. I cannot believe the people who think this spending is OK but defense spending is not.

    Defense spending is constitutional because the federal government has been charged with the defense of the nation.

    Allocating taxpayer funds for public TV is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. The government has no business doing it. Same with the environment, education, land, healthcare, you name it.

  9. #29
    Bang Bang Ridge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    I saw an interesting argument that said that Discovery Channel used to be partly funded by the government. It ran educational shows. It's all privatized now, and look at the lineup...


  10. #30
    Range Boss TEAMRICO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Fountain/Widefield/Security
    Posts
    3,327

    Default

    I'm entitled to gettin me some thick Celtic Gals and you touch my Bob Ross and his happy trees I'm gona cry racism!!!

    Who am I kidding, cut em.
    NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle and Shotgun Instructor.
    NRA Range Safety Officer for Local Shoot Events. Contact Me. POST Certified.

    KING: [Watching the ambush party leave into the jungle] I'm glad I ain't going with them. Somewhere out there is the beast and he hungry tonight.
    Platoon 1986
    NO RANGE FOR YOU!!!.....NEXT!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •