Piers Morgan vs. A Marine

[tmleadr03]

He is a member on arfcom.

[Trigger]

seems as though morgan is itching for an all out altercation with someone. all these "debates" with people he's bound to call someone and piss them off enough.

[NMB2]

You don't argue with leftists to change the minds of leftists (such is a fools errand).

You argue with leftists so that the fence sitters that are watching may be swayed to your side.

In that vein I'd say it's Josh Boston 1, Alex Jones 0, Piers Morgan 0

I didn't say you try to sway the left. I said nobody was left swayed..... I don't think the fence sitters are a large enough majority to care about, and myself personally could give 10,000 shits what they feel. This isn't a democratic issue, this is not democracy where the masses vote on it. This is a Constitutional Right, and it is not for debate in my mind, so I don't even debate it.

[Kraven251]

seems as though morgan is itching for an all out altercation with someone. all these "debates" with people he's bound to call someone and piss them off enough.

Well, he went from Alex Jones: media personality, to Josh Boston: Marine... So what Piers is really looking for is someone with the training of Boston with the self control of Jones. I wonder if he realizes how that will play out for him; I'll offer up poorly.

[TFOGGER]

Ted Nugent v. Piers Morgan, cage match.

[Ghosty]

Thank you Josh Boston. As far as im concerned Morgan should not have a say in the matter, As he is a foreigner.

Agreed. Although AlexJones isn't the right vehicle, I love his petition to deport Morgan, awesome even if going nowhere.

[Ronin13]

Ted Nugent v. Piers Morgan, cage match.

Already been done..

[Aloha_Shooter]

I didn't say you try to sway the left. I said nobody was left swayed..... I don't think the fence sitters are a large enough majority to care about, and myself personally could give 10,000 shits what they feel. This isn't a democratic issue, this is not democracy where the masses vote on it. This is a Constitutional Right, and it is not for debate in my mind, so I don't even debate it.

You SHOULD care what fence sitters think because whether they are a majority or not (and I suspect they could be), we are NOT a majority. We need them on our side or you can kiss your Right good bye. All the gun banners need to do is sway enough fence sitters for them to get a slim majority in 39 states. You don't need to be rabid but you DO need to calmly, cogently and consistently defend our Rights in ways that make sense and win support from the fence sitters.

[Teufelhund]

You SHOULD care what fence sitters think because whether they are a majority or not (and I suspect they could be), we are NOT a majority. We need them on our side or you can kiss your Right good bye. All the gun banners need to do is sway enough fence sitters for them to get a slim majority in 39 states. You don't need to be rabid but you DO need to calmly, cogently and consistently defend our Rights in ways that make sense and win support from the fence sitters.

It has been said before, but evidently is worth repeating: this is not a democracy. The majority does not have the authority to take away anyone's rights.

[Ronin13]

you can kiss your Right good bye.

I guess I was wrong growing up thinking rights, as reiterated in the Constitution and Bill of Rights, were something that couldn't be taken away, that we all are born with...