Plus the home depot by my house seems to hire women based on looks and that makes them A-OK with me.
Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums
Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
Plus the home depot by my house seems to hire women based on looks and that makes them A-OK with me.
really? most of the ones I have been too look like they hire the "should be marching for civil unions rally."Originally Posted by Ashton
..........not that I have anything against that, but there is some truth in it.
My friend worked for them for like 4 years and was let go out of the blue back in 2004, he wasn't the only one. He ended up as part of a lawsuit with several other ex employees claiming that certain people in upper management had bias towards those who were straight and male. He ended up getting part of the $$$ in the settlement.
As Jim said, part liability, not always necessarily anti-gun. Every place I have worked at in Human services has a NO weapons policy, not because of an agenda but for liability, specially working with people or the general public. You might not imagine the liability insurance they already have to pay, imagine what it cost if the insurance company knew they allowed weapons on premises.
Last edited by Skully; 01-27-2013 at 00:59.
"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles. --Jeff Cooper"
My feedback
Longmont isn't far and there are a lot less people up here... You might enjoy it. He should have lost because he is a he and they had bias towards straight males... The fuck? Everything is wrong with this lawsuit.really? most of the ones I have been too look like they hire the "should be marching for civil unions rally."
..........not that I have anything against that, but there is some truth in it.
My friend worked for them for like 4 years and was let go out of the blue back in 2004, he wasn't the only one. He ended up as part of a lawsuit with several other ex employees claiming that certain people in upper management had bias towards those who who were straight and male. He ended up getting part of $$$ in the settlement.
As Jim said, part liability, not always necessarily anti-gun. Every place I have worked at in Human services has a NO weapons policy, not because of an agenda but for liability. You got to imagine the liability insurance they have to pay.
Should have clarified, the "Home Depot upper management" named in the suit were split tails................... not males.
Last edited by Skully; 01-27-2013 at 01:00.
"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles. --Jeff Cooper"
My feedback
Women... Home depot... Seriously? IT ALL MAKES SO MUCH SENSE NOW.Should have clarified, the "Home Depot upper management" named in the suit were split tails................... not males.
You got a problem with women in upper management at Home Depot? ...................
"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles. --Jeff Cooper"
My feedback
Make me a sammich, back in the kitchen, shit. Yup. I don't follow women. Just policy.You got a problem with women in upper management at Home Depot? ...................
right? jeez I've seen some FEmployees there that I've wanted to build a shrine to
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote