Close
Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 72
  1. #31
    Gong Shooter mtnhack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Windsor
    Posts
    406

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bailey Guns View Post
    There is no such thing as a pro-gun democrat. There just isn't and I've already articulated why that's true. Not you nor anyone else has been able to articulate why it isn't true except to say that, "I like guns" or "I own guns" or "Sen So-n-So voted against that gun bill".
    I believe this to be non-sensical. So there are no pro-choice republicans? There are no pro-GunControl Republicans? How about pro-gay republicans?
    Just because it is in the party platform doesn't mean these people won't vote their constituents' wishes (more and more unlikely), what is perceived publicly popular at the time, their personal ethics, their religious beliefs, or what their lobby interests tell them to vote for on condition of later payment.
    Just as you point out that there is almost never a pro-gun control republican, you must also allow that there are the occasional pro-gun democrats.
    I will not abide this abomination. (1224)

  2. #32
    Fleeing Idaho to get IKEA Bailey Guns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Oklahoma
    Posts
    16,473
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nynco View Post
    Bailey... I think the solution is to weaken the power of the parties and instead make the system more dependent on the actual person you vote for. Or find some other way to make it more than just 2 parties that always control everything.
    I don't think there's a problem with our electoral system. I think the problem lies with an oppressive federal government that far exceeds it's Constitutional powers. I'll also concede that problem has been caused by both parties. I will, however, state that in general the republican party is far more in favor or downsizing the federal government than the democrat party is. Just another in a long list of reasons not to vote for democrats.
    Stella - my best girl ever.
    11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010



    Don't wanna get shot by the police?
    "Stop Resisting Arrest!"


  3. #33
    The Bullet Button of Gun Owners nynco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    1,793

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bailey Guns View Post
    I don't think there's a problem with our electoral system. I think the problem lies with an oppressive federal government that far exceeds it's Constitutional powers. I'll also concede that problem has been caused by both parties. I will, however, state that in general the republican party is far more in favor or downsizing the federal government than the democrat party is. Just another in a long list of reasons not to vote for democrats.
    Bailey do you honestly feel free when we only have two choices...and those two parties rig the rules to keep out all other candidates? Is that good for out nation? What did the founding fathers say about parties?

  4. #34
    Fleeing Idaho to get IKEA Bailey Guns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Oklahoma
    Posts
    16,473
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mtnhack View Post
    I believe this to be non-sensical. So there are no pro-choice republicans? There are no pro-GunControl Republicans? How about pro-gay republicans?
    Just because it is in the party platform doesn't mean these people won't vote their constituents' wishes (more and more unlikely), what is perceived publicly popular at the time, their personal ethics, their religious beliefs, or what their lobby interests tell them to vote for on condition of later payment.
    Just as you point out that there is almost never a pro-gun control republican, you must also allow that there are the occasional pro-gun democrats.
    I don't have to allow any such thing. There may be a republican who believes in "choice". But if he/she supports the party then he/she isn't truly "pro-choice" any more than a democrat who likes guns is "pro-gun". I think you helped prove my point rather than disprove it.

    And if you think that party leadership (of both parties) doesn't use every means within their power to influence votes on important issues by party members who tend to "stray" from the party line then you really don't know how Washington works. Members are sometimes allowed to buck the party line, especially when the vote isn't going to be close anyway. I will also concede that sometimes a party member will vote against the party anyway, despite the pressure from leadership...but it's not a common thing and they will eventually pay for their transgression. One way or another.
    Stella - my best girl ever.
    11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010



    Don't wanna get shot by the police?
    "Stop Resisting Arrest!"


  5. #35
    Fleeing Idaho to get IKEA Bailey Guns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Oklahoma
    Posts
    16,473
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nynco View Post
    Bailey do you honestly feel free when we only have two choices...and those two parties rig the rules to keep out all other candidates? Is that good for out nation? What did the founding fathers say about parties?
    You have far more than two choices. You may have only two realistic choices in terms of a candidate you like being elected. But that's not the fault of the system or either of the parties.

    And potential candidates don't get into this game blindly. They know what they're doing when they choose to run. It's a personal choice.
    Last edited by Bailey Guns; 05-03-2013 at 12:06.
    Stella - my best girl ever.
    11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010



    Don't wanna get shot by the police?
    "Stop Resisting Arrest!"


  6. #36
    Bang Bang Ridge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bailey Guns View Post
    A pro-gun person wouldn't even have to think in order to answer that question.
    What about a pro individual rights person?

    How can people on here say that they are for individual rights, and then say that the government should be able to tell someone what they can do with their body, or in their bedroom?

  7. #37
    Fleeing Idaho to get IKEA Bailey Guns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Oklahoma
    Posts
    16,473
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    While I may or may not agree with things like you mention, Ridge, it's not the important issue to me that the 2A is. Therefore, issues like gay marriage and what not take a back seat to others because they aren't as high on my priority list.

    How can a person who argues vehemently for "gay rights" or "individual rights" argue against Second Amendment rights? Works both ways. And since I'd wager that most gays are democrats...
    Last edited by Bailey Guns; 05-03-2013 at 12:11.
    Stella - my best girl ever.
    11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010



    Don't wanna get shot by the police?
    "Stop Resisting Arrest!"


  8. #38
    Don of the Asian Mafia ChunkyMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Centennial, CO
    Posts
    8,397
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    ^ The argument on pro life is simple... everyone has right including a baby. You are correct on the bedroom part - non of anyone else business beside the couple/partners. That should also applies on religion rights. The big gov needs to stay out of religious organization on how it conducts itself.

    Between the two parties, democrat is the one for more regulations and intrusion into personal freedom whether it's taxation, registration, regulation on personal property, belief, and way of life. I may or may not vote for gop'ers... but I will never vote for DEMs.
    Quote Originally Posted by crays View Post
    It doesn't matter how many rifles you buy...they're still cheaper than one wife, in the long run.
    Coarf Feedback
    Instagram

  9. #39
    Bang Bang Ridge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChunkyMonkey View Post
    ^ The argument on pro life is simple...
    Is it?

    everyone has right including a baby.
    In scientific terms, a fetus is a parasite. It consumes nutrition from the host animal while providing nothing. Unless you count slower response time and inconsistencies in brain activity as a benefit.

  10. #40
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ridge View Post
    Is it?



    In scientific terms, a fetus is a parasite. It consumes nutrition from the host animal while providing nothing. Unless you count slower response time and inconsistencies in brain activity as a benefit.
    Breasts get bigger and hair looks fantastic.
    Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est

    Sane person with a better sight picture

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •