Close
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32
  1. #21
    Machine Gunner Jeffrey Lebowski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    1,615

    Default

    My dad spent his career as a traffic engineer doing signs, his buddy who I've known my whole life did the signals for a large city in the upper midwest.
    You'd think timing the lights would be easy. Especially in a city that, much like Denver, makes up almost the whole of the county's namesake.
    Nope, just like LE jurisdictions, these are pissing matches between city/county/state of the highest order that you, the little guy, ends up losing.

  2. #22
    I am my own action figure
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Wheat Ridge
    Posts
    4,010
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Yep. We did a study for Denver, which they paid $200K for, in 1986 on signal timing and the politics is what shot it down. We were looking as reducing emissions on the order of tons per day. Some cities actually will time their lights to ensure people have to stop in certain retail zones.
    Good Shooting, MarkCO

    www.CarbonArms.us
    www.crci.org

  3. #23
    CO-AR's Secret Jedi roberth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elk City, Oklahoma
    Posts
    10,501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarkCO View Post
    Yep. We did a study for Denver, which they paid $200K for, in 1986 on signal timing and the politics is what shot it down. We were looking as reducing emissions on the order of tons per day. Some cities actually will time their lights to ensure people have to stop in certain retail zones.
    Exactly, I've always thought this. They are looking for the impulse buyer in order to increase city/state income from sales taxes and they'll waste everyone else's time and fuel to do it.

  4. #24
    Amateur meat smoker blacklabel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Greeley
    Posts
    6,557

    Default Re: Mike Rosen and Hick

    Quote Originally Posted by roberth View Post
    Exactly, I've always thought this. They are looking for the impulse buyer in order to increase city/state income from sales taxes and they'll waste everyone else's time and fuel to do it.
    And what is their incentive to improve fuel economy or reduce fuel usage. If they do, state income from fuel taxes is reduced further hurting their income.

  5. #25
    I blame everything on Tummy Aches
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    7,688

    Default

    We as Americans, have no one to blame for the situation we are in. Whether it be politics, bitching about made in china shit, foreign dependence on oil etc. Wait till boulder gets off the xcel grid and manages its own power and gas bought from xcel and other companies. We should build a moat around that city, no ways in or out. Do weekly air drops of hash brownies and all will be right with the world.

  6. #26
    CO-AR's Secret Jedi roberth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elk City, Oklahoma
    Posts
    10,501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blacklabel View Post
    And what is their incentive to improve fuel economy or reduce fuel usage. If they do, state income from fuel taxes is reduced further hurting their income.
    Exactly. The more we idle, the more gas we use, the more gas tax (43 cents a gallon) they collect.

  7. #27
    Looking Elsewhere
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    The Peoples Republic (Boulder)
    Posts
    3,169

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronin13 View Post
    Nail, meet hammer! Pretty much. From everything I've learned in coming up with "let's see if these libs are onto something or completely full of shit" research, the efficiency percentages for wind and solar is absurdly low, the scale needed to produce much of anything is astronomical- look at it this way, the average home uses 14,000 kwh of electricity per year. Narrow that down to an average of 40 kwh per day. 8 sq ft of solar panel produces approx 1/3 kwh per day (with 4 hours of sunlight producing at roughly 12% efficiency). You would need about 67 panels (at 8 square feet that's 536 sq ft) just to produce one day's worth of power, and that's if it's a sunny day for the entirety of the day. Yeah, come back to me when it's as effective and cheap as coal/oil/natural gas/nuclear.
    Hmmm, that's weird because I know a couple people that have net zero houses via solar panels.

  8. #28
    I am my own action figure
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Wheat Ridge
    Posts
    4,010
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by def90 View Post
    Hmmm, that's weird because I know a couple people that have net zero houses via solar panels.
    Not weird, you've just bought into the liberal math. What house size, gross investment (minus tax write-offs and green comps) for all systems (main and back-up) and the system lifespan.

    Do the math, and you WILL see a "net loss".
    Good Shooting, MarkCO

    www.CarbonArms.us
    www.crci.org

  9. #29
    High Power Shooter FromMyColdDeadHand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    815

    Default

    On the gun debate Hick compared gun rights to water rights and having to balance rural vs urban constituencies. Since when is an finite resource in any way linked to an unalienable right? If we have more CCWers in Weld, does that mean that we have to have less in Boulder??? Dumb-ass/.
    I'll stop buying black rifles when my wife stops buying black shoes.

  10. #30
    Ammosexual GilpinGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Rural Gilpin County
    Posts
    7,221

    Default

    Why does Rosen even have Hick on anyway? He never really answers a question....ever.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •