Well, F***.

[Aloha_Shooter]

Posting dumb arse blatantly false garbage just makes us all look like morons and gives the Obamabots something to point to in claiming we're all whackjobs.

[spqrzilla]

Also annoyed by the tinfoil hat crap.

[Irving]

Pro tip: Never believe, or share anything you get in an email.
I've extended this to not even reading things that start with "I got/saw this in an Email." An example would be this thread. I didn't read this email, I just waited 5 minutes to confirm my suspicions.

No offense of course; just a tip.

[hghclsswhitetrsh]

Pro tip: Never believe, or share anything you get in an email.
I've extended this to not even reading things that start with "I got/saw this in an Email." An example would be this thread. I didn't read this email, I just waited 5 minutes to confirm my suspicions.

No offense of course; just a tip.

So I can't make $10,000 by cashing a check for a guy that found me on Craigslist? Hrrrmmmmmm. Not so sure...

[Great-Kazoo]

Pro tip: Never believe, or share anything you get in an email.
I've extended this to not even reading things that start with "I got/saw this in an Email." An example would be this thread. I didn't read this email, I just waited 5 minutes to confirm my suspicions.

No offense of course; just a tip.

+1 unless it's an e-m from someone i know WITH OUT a FORWARDED i send to trash w/out opening it up. We've blocked friends n family for less.

[Singlestack]

The time out idea sounds fine, but that could also apply to someone who posted the recent Fox 31 story about the Italian shotgun CEO who was detained by LE at the merchandise mart.

[cstone]

The time out idea sounds fine, but that could also apply to someone who posted the recent Fox 31 story about the Italian shotgun CEO who was detained by LE at the merchandise mart.

He was banned a long time ago. Just check his title.

[def90]

Is an article claiming to have been checked by Snopes only to have been found to be wrong by Snopes kind of like a double agent? How do we not know this is some kind of triple redirection going on here in that the original article is really the true article?

[Rucker61]

Is an article claiming to have been checked by Snopes only to have been found to be wrong by Snopes kind of like a double agent? How do we not know this is some kind of triple redirection going on here in that the original article is really the true article?

Check snopes.

[wax_job]

Is an article claiming to have been checked by Snopes only to have been found to be wrong by Snopes kind of like a double agent? How do we not know this is some kind of triple redirection going on here in that the original article is really the true article?

Trace-buster, buster?