Close
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25
  1. #1

    Default 1224 and selling to non-restricted states?

    I know that after July 1st we are not allowed to buy or sell mags over 15 rounds but can keep the ones we already own. However what about selling to states without restrictions? For example, would it be legal for me to sell a 30 round mag that I owed before July 1st to someone in Texas through a online source like gunbroker or ar15.com once the law goes into effect?


    Also a huge thank you to those working on recalling Morse (I've donated a few times and will try to again soon) and a huge thank you to all the sheriffs standing up for our rights. Through this and 2014 hopefully we can win back our beautiful state and repeal all of these idiotic laws...
    Last edited by Jeep297; 05-24-2013 at 10:42.

  2. #2
    Machine Gunner Circuits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Colofornia Springs, CO
    Posts
    2,411

    Default

    That is in fact what the dimocrats are hoping will happen to all the >15 capacity mags, over time - that they will be carried or sold out of state.
    "The only real difference between the men and the boys, is the number and size, and cost of their toys."
    NRA Life, GOA Life, SAF Life, CSSA Life, NRA Certified Instructor Circuits' Feedback

  3. #3
    IN MEMORIUM
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The RUST Belt (Peoria, Illinois)
    Posts
    7,319

    Default

    The following is a post I made on May 21st and received not one comment. I'm starting to believe that when anyone sees a BlasterBob post, they just ignore it thinking that the OLD bastard is just making another idle post. Anyhow, here's what I posted:

    This is wording in the CO AG's Technical Guidance letter:
    "However, the bill prohibits the owner of a large-capacity magazine from selling or transferring it after July 1, 2013" and he goes on and on ------.
    The way this is worded, he makes it sound like we cannot ever sell these hi-cap mags to ANYONE after July 1, 2013, even if they are taken it out of the great State of CO to be sold in some other State that still allows possession of them. That's the way it is worded or at least the way I interpret it although there would be no way in hell that they could enforce our not being able to sell them outside of CO.
    Looks like our wonderful AG will have to add a few words to his "letter of guidance"

    Now, sure hope this is not considered a REPOST!!!!!!

  4. #4
    Zombie Slayer kidicarus13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,304

    Default Re: 1224 and selling to non-restricted states?

    Thanks for the clarification but I will do what I want with my property.
    Lessons cost money. Good ones cost lots. -Tony Beets

  5. #5
    IN MEMORIUM
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The RUST Belt (Peoria, Illinois)
    Posts
    7,319

    Default

    CLARIFICATION?
    If the AG's bull shit statement about us NOT being able to get rid of these magazines is clear to you, you must be capable of "reading between the lines". I can't see how he has ANY control over us regarding selling off these mags once we are out of "HIS" State and way out of his jurisdiction.
    Last edited by BlasterBob; 05-24-2013 at 15:08.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlasterBob View Post
    The following is a post I made on May 21st and received not one comment. I'm starting to believe that when anyone sees a BlasterBob post, they just ignore it thinking that the OLD bastard is just making another idle post. Anyhow, here's what I posted:

    This is wording in the CO AG's Technical Guidance letter:
    "However, the bill prohibits the owner of a large-capacity magazine from selling or transferring it after July 1, 2013" and he goes on and on ------.
    The way this is worded, he makes it sound like we cannot ever sell these hi-cap mags to ANYONE after July 1, 2013, even if they are taken it out of the great State of CO to be sold in some other State that still allows possession of them. That's the way it is worded or at least the way I interpret it although there would be no way in hell that they could enforce our not being able to sell them outside of CO.
    Looks like our wonderful AG will have to add a few words to his "letter of guidance"

    Now, sure hope this is not considered a REPOST!!!!!!

    This is exactly what I'm talking about. The way it's written seems to imply that after July 1st one is not legally able to sell their 15+ round magazines, even to someone out of state where it is legal to own. When you look at the restrictions on removable floor plates (readily convertible), the "continuos possession" section, the arbitrary limits on capacity, and the seemingly inability to sell out of state, it's blatantly obvious this legislation is aimed at law abiding citizens, not criminals (as if that was ever in question for us). I'm so sick of this shit, wake the hell up America! If we can't turn this around by 2014 I may have to sadly leave this state I have so proudly called home for the last 8 years
    Last edited by Jeep297; 05-24-2013 at 15:34.

  7. #7
    At least my tag is unmolested
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    CANON CITY, CO
    Posts
    3,133

    Default

    The law criminalizes possession - in Colorado - of a magazine greater than 15 rounds that was not owned/possessed before July 1st 2013. So obviously you can sell them to people out of state.
    Sayonara

  8. #8
    IN MEMORIUM
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The RUST Belt (Peoria, Illinois)
    Posts
    7,319

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spqrzilla View Post
    3. So obviously you can sell them to people out of state.
    I agree but this is not allowed - according to the exact wording of the AG's Tech. Guidance Letter. Is that not the way it is worded???

  9. #9
    Machine Gunner Goodburbon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Cotopaxi, CO
    Posts
    1,434

    Default 1224 and selling to non-restricted states?

    The definition of "Continuous possession" is my concern.

    Because the definition of possession is not the same as ownership.

    I own lots of things that are not in my "possession" right now.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
    The people lived in fear of reprisal from their leaders, children cried themselves to sleep, all hope was lost... and then there was a whale.

    www.bugoutwhale.com

  10. #10
    Zombie Slayer kidicarus13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,304

    Default Re: 1224 and selling to non-restricted states?

    You guys get so caught up in the words that it makes me laugh a little.
    Lessons cost money. Good ones cost lots. -Tony Beets

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •