Officers that shot elk, pt 2

[HBARleatherneck]

The scary thing here is the premeditated cover-up executed by the officer in question.

this is the whole issue. If he would plan and execute that plan to kill an elk, Cover it up, lie, etc. What would stop someone like this from doing this to anyone? framing someone? stealing on the job? the guy should be hammered because of his position and he should never ever be in a postion of trust ever again.

[Bailey Guns]

I suppose it is possible the da was pissed and said no to any plea deal.

That's exactly what happened. It's not speculation. The DA refused to offer or accept any plea deal with Carter.

[DavieD55]

this is the whole issue. If he would plan and execute that plan to kill an elk, Cover it up, lie, etc. What would stop someone like this from doing this to anyone? framing someone? stealing on the job? the guy should be hammered because of his position and he should never ever be in a postion of trust ever again.

Exactly. ^

[BPTactical]

That's exactly what happened. It's not speculation. The DA refused to offer or accept any plea deal with Carter.

Holding to a higher standard perhaps?
What a concept.

[hatidua]

It's Boulder....y'just might want to do your premeditated out of season black-ops elk hunting for well known neighborhood animals in a different municipality. Hindsight is likely proving to be very clear for the clown formerly known as officer Carter.

[sniper7]

Glad he is getting punished.

[osok-308]

OK, he deserves to be punished for what he did, especially under the color of law, but did I read that correctly? Prayer vigils for a damned elk? WTF?

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk

I read comments after reading this article. There were people saying "5 years isn't enough, he needs to serve 50" and "he deserves worse! an eye for an eye". (people actually want him to pay with his life?) I know what this guy did was obviously wrong, but to try to demand that he must pay with his life? There are some stupid people out there.

[BPTactical]

I read comments after reading this article. There were people saying "5 years isn't enough, he needs to serve 50" and "he deserves worse! an eye for an eye". (people actually want him to pay with his life?) I know what this guy did was obviously wrong, but to try to demand that he must pay with his life? There are some stupid people out there.

It's Boulder.

[merl]

I read comments after reading this article. There were people saying "5 years isn't enough, he needs to serve 50" and "he deserves worse! an eye for an eye". (people actually want him to pay with his life?) I know what this guy did was obviously wrong, but to try to demand that he must pay with his life? There are some stupid people out there.

I wonder how the same people would answer the question "Do you support the death penalty?"

[roberth]

I wonder how the same people would answer the question "Do you support the death penalty?"

For murdering a human?, surely you jest.

Now a tasty animal, well fer shure.