Guys house burns to the ground and DirecTV says he owes them $400 for lost equipment. http://gazette.com/directtv-to-fire-...rticle/1502291
Guys house burns to the ground and DirecTV says he owes them $400 for lost equipment. http://gazette.com/directtv-to-fire-...rticle/1502291
They are both right.
ETA: Reading the comments is as bad as reading comments about gun control. Everyone on there is pretty much retarded. Sorry HighClass.
Last edited by Irving; 06-13-2013 at 22:33.
"There are no finger prints under water."
It sucks, but if all 360 homes had DirecTV, that's $144,000 someone has to pay, and $400 is on the cheap end for Sat equipment. Should be covered under homeowners insurance.
Last edited by hurley842002; 06-13-2013 at 22:36.
Balance sheet includes "goodwill". Their balance sheet values goodwill at zero. I'll stick to Netflix...
What if there was a rental car parked in the garage when the house went up? Think the rental car company would say, "Don't worry, we know you're going through a hardship right now. We'll write it off for you."?
"There are no finger prints under water."
Logic fails me here...comparing a car to a small electronic box? Comparing a homeowner who has lost everything to a big multibillion dollar corporation? yeah tell the people in Black Forest to go eff themselves? nice...
To be clear, I would have no problem with DirectTV cutting this guy a break. My issue is with the tone of the article, and the tone of all the people complaining in the comments section. The fact is that DirectTV is not the responsible party in the deal, and people expect them to take a loss on the deal.
"There are no finger prints under water."