ZIMMERMAN TRIAL LIVE LINK

[RMAC757]

[QUOTE=jim;1216237]Tell me sir, Do you still beat your wife ?


Today trademarks "mom" takes the stand. All the "EXPERTS" agree you are unable to clearly identify whose voice is whose. YET mom is going to say, very emotionally we all know, it is trademarks voice.

Having only the basic of armchair lawyering degrees i would ask. Even though Mom was not an actual witness, does this open the doors for the defense? All the "inadmissable evidence" regarding trademarks life, interaction with the law etc, should now be allowed.

Of course in reality the whole circus has been and will be fixed regarding the outcome. No matter what this jury's verdict, someone some where will push for retrial, IF he is found innocent. If guilty the appeals process will go one forever.

Perhaps one thing we might all agree on is the "public's" reaction within the "african - american" neighborhoods. [/QUOTE]

No Jim...No we can't. I'm not saying that some type some type of anarchy won't be incited.....somewhere. But that "African Americans" Neihborhoods will collectively riot and burn down if the verdict isn't a conviction is a bit of a broad stroke. A couple maybe, history shows that this is possible. History also shows us that blacks haven't cornered the market on murderous riots in this country.

[davsel]

[QUOTE=RMAC757;1216357]

Tell me sir, Do you still beat your wife ?


Today trademarks "mom" takes the stand. All the "EXPERTS" agree you are unable to clearly identify whose voice is whose. YET mom is going to say, very emotionally we all know, it is trademarks voice.

Having only the basic of armchair lawyering degrees i would ask. Even though Mom was not an actual witness, does this open the doors for the defense? All the "inadmissable evidence" regarding trademarks life, interaction with the law etc, should now be allowed.

Of course in reality the whole circus has been and will be fixed regarding the outcome. No matter what this jury's verdict, someone some where will push for retrial, IF he is found innocent. If guilty the appeals process will go one forever.

Perhaps one thing we might all agree on is the "public's" reaction within the "african - american" neighborhoods. [/QUOTE]

No Jim...No we can't. I'm not saying that some type some type of anarchy won't be incited.....somewhere. But that "African Americans" Neihborhoods will collectively riot and burn down if the verdict isn't a conviction is a bit of a broad stroke. A couple maybe, history shows that this is possible. History also shows us that blacks haven't cornered the market on murderous riots in this country.

Please direct me to a murderous riot breaking out in this country, after a jury verdict, that did not occur in a primarily black neighborhood. I'm not definitively stating that there has not been any, just that I cannot seem to find one.

[RMAC757]

[QUOTE=davsel;1216373]

Please direct me to a murderous riot breaking out in this country, after a jury verdict, that did not occur in a primarily black neighborhood. I'm not definitively stating that there has not been any, just that I cannot seem to find one.

This is starting to go way off topic but if you'd like I can point you to quite a few. I'd like to not have Trayvon Martin Part Deux from last year....too ugly. Brought out the worst in everyone. Were the following the result of a Jury Verict, I don't think so. To me a riot is a riot especially when race is involved. Look up the Riots following The Jack Johnson-James Jefferies fight, The Red-Summer of 1919, Poughkeepsie Riots, Rosewood Riots, New York City Draft Riots, Chicago Riot of 1919, Los Angeles Ant-Chinese Riots, Halloween in Boulder, Apple Store opening.....you get my point. There's dozens I didn't list. Ugliness isn't reserved for one group.

[davsel]

[QUOTE=davsel;1216373]

Please direct me to a murderous riot breaking out in this country, after a jury verdict, that did not occur in a primarily black neighborhood. I'm not definitively stating that there has not been any, just that I cannot seem to find one.

Looks like I'm not the only one expecting this result: