Close
Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 100
  1. #21
    Gong Shooter mikedubs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    348

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hurley842002 View Post
    Sounds like just what the Dems wanted, no more *recorded* private party sales period...
    FIFY

    Nice job dumbasses...make us all criminals for selling personal property.
    To question your government is not unpatriotic — to not question your government is unpatriotic.

    Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws.

    But, it's for the children!

  2. #22
    Gong Shooter fj605's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Arvada
    Posts
    422

    Default

    Since Sportsman's isn't going to sell any remaining firearms that have standard magazine capacities that are non-Colorado compliant after tomorrow, will they have to run BGCs to return them to their distributors? This is assuming they don't load them out tomorrow night.
    There's a fine line between cuddling and holding someone down so they can't get away.

  3. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jerrymrc View Post
    Why is it I see very few background checks being done for private arms.

    That just killed any private person from taking anything to a gun show. Not passing the check is one thing but then running another check on the owner as well.....
    HUGE problem in this scenario. The number one concern about HB1229, and main reason many will never do these.

    BTW, a fee is going to be associated to this stuff too. Ya, I know what the law says but no way people are doing this for $10. Won't even cover the labor and time involved. There are ways around the law's wording and it will happen by those that will do these transfers.
    Mom's comin' 'round to put it back the way it ought to be.

    Anyone that thinks war is good is ignorant. Anyone that thinks war isn't needed is stupid.

  4. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fj605 View Post
    Since Sportsman's isn't going to sell any remaining firearms that have standard magazine capacities that are non-Colorado compliant after tomorrow, will they have to run BGCs to return them to their distributors? This is assuming they don't load them out tomorrow night.
    FFL to FFL doesn't require this...
    Mom's comin' 'round to put it back the way it ought to be.

    Anyone that thinks war is good is ignorant. Anyone that thinks war isn't needed is stupid.

  5. #25
    Industry Partner cysoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Brighton, CO
    Posts
    1,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fj605 View Post
    Since Sportsman's isn't going to sell any remaining firearms that have standard magazine capacities that are non-Colorado compliant after tomorrow, will they have to run BGCs to return them to their distributors? This is assuming they don't load them out tomorrow night.
    I doubt that any distributor is going to accept these firearms back. What I am sure will end up happening is that Sportsman's (and all other large chain stores) will send their "CO-illegal" guns to their stores in other states.

  6. #26
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Castle Rock, Colorado
    Posts
    728

    Default

    Really, why bother even following this law. There is no registration of firearms thus no way to know who owns what. Screw this law, it is not enforceable unless you are buying form an undercover or get caught in a sting of some sort. If you know the person though, screw it!

    Ok, rant off, this just pisses me off!

  7. #27
    If I had a son he would look like....Ben SideShow Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    SE Aurora
    Posts
    7,120

    Default

    The $10 fee is for the Background Check through CBI, the FFL dealers can charge a Tranfer fee as they wish. I have had a dealer already do this to me, $10 for the Background check, plus 2X $25 Tranfer fees for 2 items and this was for a receiving FFL.
    I am sure they will increase this transfer fee for the hassle of a person to person sale.
    My T.P. wheeling and dealing feedback is here.

    Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one, and it stinks more than mine.


    Yo Homie, That my chainsaw ?



    Pati, improbe et vince

  8. #28
    Industry Partner cysoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Brighton, CO
    Posts
    1,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SideShow Bob View Post
    The $10 fee is for the Background Check through CBI, the FFL dealers can charge a Tranfer fee as they wish. I have had a dealer already do this to me, $10 for the Background check, plus 2X $25 Tranfer fees for 2 items and this was for a receiving FFL.
    I am sure they will increase this transfer fee for the hassle of a person to person sale.
    If a dealer is receiving a firearm for someone (for example, when a firearm is being shipped from another state), they are allowed to charge whatever they want as a service fee for the transfer but, if they are just facilitating the sale between two people in Colorado, HB 13-1229 is very specific when it says that the dealer can only charge a fee not to exceed $10.

    18-12-112(2)(d) - A LICENSED GUN DEALER MAY CHARGE A FEE FOR SERVICES RENDERED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, WHICH FEE SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN DOLLARS.

  9. #29
    IN MEMORIUM
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The RUST Belt (Peoria, Illinois)
    Posts
    7,319

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cysoto View Post
    If a dealer is receiving a firearm for someone (for example, when a firearm is being shipped from another state), they are allowed to charge whatever they want as a service fee for the transfer but, if they are just facilitating the sale between two people in Colorado, HB 13-1229 is very specific when it says that the dealer can only charge a fee not to exceed $10.

    18-12-112(2)(d) - A LICENSED GUN DEALER MAY CHARGE A FEE FOR SERVICES RENDERED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, WHICH FEE SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN DOLLARS.
    So, you just know there will be damn few FFL dealers who will agree to screw around with these transfers if $10 is actually the maximum they can charge per 18-12-112(2)(d) for their transfer service. Surely some of our FFL holders will jump on here with a comment or two!
    Before this law goes into effect, dealers have been able to charge a maximum of $10 for BG checks while at a gun show..

  10. #30
    If I had a son he would look like....Ben SideShow Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    SE Aurora
    Posts
    7,120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cysoto View Post
    If a dealer is receiving a firearm for someone (for example, when a firearm is being shipped from another state), they are allowed to charge whatever they want as a service fee for the transfer but, if they are just facilitating the sale between two people in Colorado, HB 13-1229 is very specific when it says that the dealer can only charge a fee not to exceed $10.

    18-12-112(2)(d) - A LICENSED GUN DEALER MAY CHARGE A FEE FOR SERVICES RENDERED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, WHICH FEE SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN DOLLARS.

    my bad...........
    My T.P. wheeling and dealing feedback is here.

    Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one, and it stinks more than mine.


    Yo Homie, That my chainsaw ?



    Pati, improbe et vince

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •