Close
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 100

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Castle Rock, Colorado
    Posts
    728

    Default

    Really, why bother even following this law. There is no registration of firearms thus no way to know who owns what. Screw this law, it is not enforceable unless you are buying form an undercover or get caught in a sting of some sort. If you know the person though, screw it!

    Ok, rant off, this just pisses me off!

  2. #2
    If I had a son he would look like....Ben SideShow Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    SE Aurora
    Posts
    7,120

    Default

    The $10 fee is for the Background Check through CBI, the FFL dealers can charge a Tranfer fee as they wish. I have had a dealer already do this to me, $10 for the Background check, plus 2X $25 Tranfer fees for 2 items and this was for a receiving FFL.
    I am sure they will increase this transfer fee for the hassle of a person to person sale.
    My T.P. wheeling and dealing feedback is here.

    Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one, and it stinks more than mine.


    Yo Homie, That my chainsaw ?



    Pati, improbe et vince

  3. #3
    Industry Partner cysoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Brighton, CO
    Posts
    1,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SideShow Bob View Post
    The $10 fee is for the Background Check through CBI, the FFL dealers can charge a Tranfer fee as they wish. I have had a dealer already do this to me, $10 for the Background check, plus 2X $25 Tranfer fees for 2 items and this was for a receiving FFL.
    I am sure they will increase this transfer fee for the hassle of a person to person sale.
    If a dealer is receiving a firearm for someone (for example, when a firearm is being shipped from another state), they are allowed to charge whatever they want as a service fee for the transfer but, if they are just facilitating the sale between two people in Colorado, HB 13-1229 is very specific when it says that the dealer can only charge a fee not to exceed $10.

    18-12-112(2)(d) - A LICENSED GUN DEALER MAY CHARGE A FEE FOR SERVICES RENDERED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, WHICH FEE SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN DOLLARS.

  4. #4
    IN MEMORIUM
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The RUST Belt (Peoria, Illinois)
    Posts
    7,319

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cysoto View Post
    If a dealer is receiving a firearm for someone (for example, when a firearm is being shipped from another state), they are allowed to charge whatever they want as a service fee for the transfer but, if they are just facilitating the sale between two people in Colorado, HB 13-1229 is very specific when it says that the dealer can only charge a fee not to exceed $10.

    18-12-112(2)(d) - A LICENSED GUN DEALER MAY CHARGE A FEE FOR SERVICES RENDERED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, WHICH FEE SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN DOLLARS.
    So, you just know there will be damn few FFL dealers who will agree to screw around with these transfers if $10 is actually the maximum they can charge per 18-12-112(2)(d) for their transfer service. Surely some of our FFL holders will jump on here with a comment or two!
    Before this law goes into effect, dealers have been able to charge a maximum of $10 for BG checks while at a gun show..

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlasterBob View Post
    So, you just know there will be damn few FFL dealers who will agree to screw around with these transfers if $10 is actually the maximum they can charge per 18-12-112(2)(d) for their transfer service. Surely some of our FFL holders will jump on here with a comment or two!
    Before this law goes into effect, dealers have been able to charge a maximum of $10 for BG checks while at a gun show..
    Well some dealers are going to be making some killings on consignments.

  6. #6
    If I had a son he would look like....Ben SideShow Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    SE Aurora
    Posts
    7,120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cysoto View Post
    If a dealer is receiving a firearm for someone (for example, when a firearm is being shipped from another state), they are allowed to charge whatever they want as a service fee for the transfer but, if they are just facilitating the sale between two people in Colorado, HB 13-1229 is very specific when it says that the dealer can only charge a fee not to exceed $10.

    18-12-112(2)(d) - A LICENSED GUN DEALER MAY CHARGE A FEE FOR SERVICES RENDERED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, WHICH FEE SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN DOLLARS.

    my bad...........
    My T.P. wheeling and dealing feedback is here.

    Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one, and it stinks more than mine.


    Yo Homie, That my chainsaw ?



    Pati, improbe et vince

  7. #7
    High Power Shooter james_bond_007's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Westminster
    Posts
    926

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SideShow Bob View Post
    The $10 fee is for the Background Check through CBI, the FFL dealers can charge a Tranfer fee as they wish. I have had a dealer already do this to me, $10 for the Background check, plus 2X $25 Tranfer fees for 2 items and this was for a receiving FFL.
    I am sure they will increase this transfer fee for the hassle of a person to person sale.
    What he said ^^^^
    __________________________________________________ ______________________________________
    The fattest knight at King Arthur’s round table was Sir Cumference. He acquired his size from too much π.

  8. #8
    High Power Shooter james_bond_007's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Westminster
    Posts
    926

    Default

    It sounds like, a private sale of a C&R item to a C&R holder OR a non-C&R holder should not require a CBI BGC, per HB1229 aka 18-12-112

    HB1229 aka 18-12-112
    (6)
    THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION DO NOT APPLY TO
    (a)A TRANSFER OF AN ANTIQUE FIREARM, AS DEFINED IN 18U.S. SEC 921(a)(16), AS AMENDED,OR A CURIO OR RELIC,AS DEFINED IN 27 CFR478.11,AS AMENDED
    So M1 Garands, M1 Carbines, etc. , are still OK to do FTF and without a CBI BGC.


    Do you guys read it this way ?
    __________________________________________________ ______________________________________
    The fattest knight at King Arthur’s round table was Sir Cumference. He acquired his size from too much π.

  9. #9
    Man In The Box jhood001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Westminster
    Posts
    1,612

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by james_bond_007 View Post
    It sounds like, a private sale of a C&R item to a C&R holder OR a non-C&R holder should not require a CBI BGC, per HB1229 aka 18-12-112



    So M1 Garands, M1 Carbines, etc. , are still OK to do FTF and without a CBI BGC.


    Do you guys read it this way ?
    I'd like to know the answer to this as well!
    One does not bear arms against a rabbit. -- Garry Wills

  10. #10
    Stircrazy Jer jerrymrc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    8,166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by james_bond_007 View Post
    It sounds like, a private sale of a C&R item to a C&R holder OR a non-C&R holder should not require a CBI BGC, per HB1229 aka 18-12-112



    So M1 Garands, M1 Carbines, etc. , are still OK to do FTF and without a CBI BGC.


    Do you guys read it this way ?
    If you are correct I see a big market in Maks, CZ52's, 82's and the tokes. I can see the armslist ad now.

    C&R CZ52 for sale. NO background check required. Semi-Auto that defeats L3 body armor........

    I am kinda glad the gang bangers never figured this out.
    I see you running, tell me what your running from

    Nobody's coming, what ya do that was so wrong.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •