Colorado Attorney General John Suthers recently wrote, "An owner should not be considered to have 'transferred' a large-capacity magazine or lost 'continuous possession' of it simply by handing it to a gunsmith, hunting partner, or an acquaintance at a shooting range with the expectation that it will be promptly returned."
Lessons cost money. Good ones cost lots. -Tony Beets
Last edited by Sawin; 07-01-2013 at 16:55.
Please leave any relevant feedback here:
Sawin - Feedback thread.
So he may opt not to prosecute such "offenders", but the law is clearly written. The way it stands presently, handing one of my pre-ban mags to someone at the range would constitute breaking the law....even if he/she gave it right back.
"Continuous possession" is not the least bit ambiguous to me, but I'm glad the AG has more sense than the legislators who wrote these laws.
Please leave any relevant feedback here:
Sawin - Feedback thread.
I can see in all future training classes in Colorado the pre-class briefing, "don't anyone touch another person mags."
__________________________________________________ ______________________________________
The fattest knight at King Arthur’s round table was Sir Cumference. He acquired his size from too much π.