Temporary injunction hearing tomorrow

[ChunkyMonkey]

http://www.denverpost.com/breakingne...rado-limit-gun

Judge: No need for injunction blocking Colorado limit on gun magazines

POSTED: 07/10/2013 10:12:24 AM MDT
UPDATED: 07/10/2013 10:15:07 AM MDT

By Tom McGhee
The Denver Post

An effort by a group of sheriffs to block enforcement of Colorado's new limits on gun ammunition magazines stalled on Wednesday amid efforts to clarify the state's interpretation of the measure.
The sheriffs had asked Chief U.S. District Court Judge Marcia Krieger to issue a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of the law.
But during a hearing Wednesday, Krieger noted that both sides in the lawsuit had just agreed that Attorney General John Suthers would redraft technical guidance on key provisions of the law.
Krieger said the agreement meant there is now no need for her to issue an injunction.
The law, passed in the recent legislative session, bans magazines that hold more than 15 rounds. It took effect July 1.



Read more:Judge: No need for injunction blocking Colorado limit on gun magazines - The Denver Posthttp://www.denverpost.com/breakingne...#ixzz2Yf0vlqAU
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse
Follow us:@Denverpost on Twitter|Denverpost on Facebook

[mahkcod]

Just in
Denver judge won't block Colorado gun magazine law

http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_23632165/colorado-sheriffs-seek-stop-gun-magazine-law

[TFOGGER]

From the AP right now:

[/FONT][/COLOR]

Complete and utter bullshit. Judges issue injunctions all the time against laws that are in dispute. The court refused to hold the hearing until today(despite a request for a preliminary injunction hearing before June 30), and then refuses to issue an injunction pending the outcome of the lawsuit?

[Zundfolge]

Can we recall judges?

[xtremesvc]

WOW! Wouldn't hear the case before the law took effect and now this!

[hurley842002]

Chicago style politics through and through, complete bull$hit!!

[kidicarus13]

Complete and utter bullshit. Judges issue injunctions all the time against laws that are in dispute. The court refused to hold the hearing until today(despite a request for a preliminary injunction hearing before June 30), and then refuses to issue an injunction pending the outcome of the lawsuit?

Is there any wonder why no one has any faith in the gov't?

[MarkCO]

Because is not named on the "list" in the lawsuit has nothing to do with their actual involvement or opposition to the laws. I spent days at the capitol working to stop these silly laws and some of the "named" companies did not even show up. There were certainly some political issues in who was named, or not, but because a gunshop is not named does not mean that they did not want to be nor would they if given the opportunity. Marketing based on who is named is certainly the right of the named stores, but there is always more to the story.

[ThunderSquirrel]

According to Local Fox News, the Sheriffs who filed for the injunction, dropped the request.

"The group had filed a preliminary injunction with the U.S. District Court blocking enforcement of the law.

Judge Marcia Krieger ruled however there was no need to issue an injunction after both sides agreed that Attorney General John Suthers would draft technical guidance to help clarify the law."

http://kdvr.com/2013/07/10/sheriffs-...gazine-limits/

[Ronin13]

So to make sure I understand this correctly: so no injunction, but the suit is still full steam ahead. Well that sucks, but I sure hope we can get the state to see what kind of an asshat Hick is (lawsuits usually bring out the best in people... )