John Hickenlooper would be a smart, centrist running mate for Hillary Clinton in 2016 WTF???????????

[HBARleatherneck]

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news...linton-in-2016

DENVER - Tina Brown, editor-in-chief of The Daily Beast and Newsweek, is pitching Gov. John Hickenlooper as a possible running mate for a Hillary Clinton presidential bid.
In a Daily Beast article titled, "Tina Brown: I Know Who Hillary’s Running Mate Should Be," Brown writes: "If Hillary Clinton runs in 2016, I vote for Gov. John Hickenlooper of Colorado as her running mate."
Brown called Hickenlooper a smart, sensible governor with a centrist, pro-business philosophy

not only no, but fuck no.

she says dickenpooper has a prophetic eye on latin America. Does that mean he hires illegals and has them shoot cops? thats kind of how I read it.

[Dave]

Now you know why he signed those bills while requiring further explanation.

[Aloha_Shooter]

The only thing centrist about either of them would be the outer edge of passenger-side mirror on the limousines they ride in.

[spqrzilla]

To Tina Brown, Mao Tse Tung is a centrist.

[TFOGGER]

Hick's about as centrist as Karl Marx...

[james_bond_007]

A few years back, I asked some friends from Arkansas what they thought of their governor, Bill Clinton, now that he was president.
They said they were very happy and that a HUGE majority of the state voted for him.
Why ? , I asked.

Without hesitation, the response was ...
...because now we can get a NEW governor who might support the Will of the People of Arkansas instead of doing things to further their political career at the EXPENSE of the people of Arkansas.

Deja vu ?

[zteknik]

Were doomed....

[BuffCyclist]

Were doomed....

It's been a LONG time coming, but yes.

[zteknik]

I guess there saving Bloomberg for another term...

[Aloha_Shooter]

A few years back, I asked some friends from Arkansas what they thought of their governor, Bill Clinton, now that he was president.
They said they were very happy and that a HUGE majority of the state voted for him.
Why ? , I asked.

Without hesitation, the response was ...
...because now we can get a NEW governor who might support the Will of the People of Arkansas instead of doing things to further their political career at the EXPENSE of the people of Arkansas.

Deja vu ?

I also heard that from friends who still had relatives and friends in Arkansas. I also remember talking with a USAF E-8 who voted for Clinton in 1992. His rationale was that Clinton said he'd push to let gays in the military and Gen McPeak (then CSAF) had said he'd resign if that happened so voting for Clinton meant getting rid of McPeak ...