Close
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,936

    Default Bengahzi gets thicker

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2...Annex-Involved

    On August 12, Joe DiGenova, attorney for one of the Benghazi whistleblowers, told Washington D.C.'s WMAL that one of the reasons people have remained tight-lipped about Benghazi is because 400 U.S. missiles were "diverted to Libya" and ended up being stolen and falling into "the hands of some very ugly people."
    DiGenova represents Benghazi whistleblower Mark Thompson. He told WMAL that he "does not know whether [the missiles] were at the annex, but it is clear the annex was somehow involved in the distribution of those missiles."
    He claimed his information "comes from a former intelligence official who stayed in constant contact with people in the special ops and intelligence community." He said the biggest concern right now is finding those missiles before they can be put to use. "They are worried, specifically according to these sources, about an attempt to shoot down an airliner," he claimed.
    On August 4, Breitbart News covered a report in The Telegraph that said 35 CIA operatives were working in Benghazi when the attack against the consulate took place. The Telegraph claimed these operatives were allegedly in an "annex near the consulate [working] on a project to supply missiles from Libyan armories to Syrian Rebels."
    Months earlier, following then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta's February 7 testimony on Capitol Hill about the Benghazi attacks, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) suggested that one of the causes behind the terrorist attack "may have been that there was a gun running operation going on in Benghazi, leaving Libya and going to Turkey and [distributing] arms to the [Syrian] rebels.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  2. #2
    Guest
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Loveland
    Posts
    2,167

    Default

    Fast and Furious 2.0

  3. #3
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,936

    Default

    Arms running was an early speculation on Becks show.
    He was poo-pooed and ridiculed for stating such.
    Closer to the bone, the sweeter the meat.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  4. #4
    Door Kicker Mick-Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fremont County
    Posts
    1,577

    Default

    Ruh Roh Raggy!
    Mick-Boy

    "Men who carry rifles for a living do not seek reward outside the guild. The most cherished gift...is a nod from his peers."


    nsrconsulting.net

  5. #5
    Guest
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Loveland
    Posts
    2,167

    Default

    Oh and this will be sure reported in the news.

  6. #6
    The "Godfather" of COAR Great-Kazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Washboard Alley, AZ.
    Posts
    48,097

    Default

    I've had grass clippings stay on my shoes longer than this admin's scrutiny, by the MSM
    The Great Kazoo's Feedback

    "when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".

  7. #7
    7insert
    Guest

    Default

    Once again rand paul askes the hard questions

  8. #8

    Default

    This was brought up in another thread a while ago, perhaps in an article by Ronin? Not a lot of traction around here originally on this 'idea', but I think it has merit. Nothing surprises me...

    And I'm too lazy to go look for the thread that had it in it...
    http://disciplejourney.com

    Make men large and strong and tyranny will bankrupt itself in making shackles for them.” – Rev. Henry Ward Beecher (1813-1887) US Abolitionist Preacher

    CIPCIP

  9. #9
    Zombie Slayer Zundfolge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wichita, KS (formerly COS)
    Posts
    8,317

    Default

    This has been my theory from the beginning.

    Either it was an arms deal gone bad, or the Obama regime allowed Amb. Stephens to be murdered to keep him quiet about the fact that the regime has been arming the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Queda with heavy weapons for some time now.
    Modern liberalism is based on the idea that reality is obligated to conform to one's beliefs because; "I have the right to believe whatever I want".

    "Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen.
    -Friedrich Nietzsche

    "Every time something really bad happens, people cry out for safety, and the government answers by taking rights away from good people."
    -Penn Jillette

    A World Without Guns <- Great Read!

  10. #10
    Gong Shooter mtnhack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Windsor
    Posts
    406

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zundfolge View Post
    This has been my theory from the beginning. Either it was an arms deal gone bad, or the Obama regime allowed Amb. Stephens to be murdered to keep him quiet about the fact that the regime has been arming the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Queda with heavy weapons for some time now.
    So now you are saying the administration took out (or arranged for) our own diplomat and 3 others to be murdered for a cover up? This seems far fetched to me. I would think the attack would have been better conceived if this were the case. Supposedly, he died of asphixiation; not the most assured method of assassination.


    I am still unsure of what exactly this article is stating. Are they saying that the annex near the attacked consulate was raided during the attack and that is when the 400 missiles were stolen? If that is the case, it really does not make any sense as to why forces would have been withheld from fighting off the attack. This would have increased the liklihood of losing the missiles, and their existance and worse, origin eventually coming to light. If those missiles were in the annex and there were an attack, I would assume someone would have ordered an immense counter attack to ensure no one lived and none of those weapons made it out.
    I will not abide this abomination. (1224)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •