Well, Milt, I just don't like hypocrites, regardless of the side they profess to be on. Especially the type that shows up once in a blue moon and tries to stir up a bunch of crap. Have a nice day.
Well, Milt, I just don't like hypocrites, regardless of the side they profess to be on. Especially the type that shows up once in a blue moon and tries to stir up a bunch of crap. Have a nice day.
Last edited by Bailey Guns; 08-18-2013 at 09:35.
Stella - my best girl ever.
11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010
Don't wanna get shot by the police?
"Stop Resisting Arrest!"
"...the type that shows up once in a blue moon..."
Some of us actually work for a living. As much as I enjoy this forum, I do have a life in the real world and internet stuff is not my highest priority. As far as hypocrisy is concerned, you choose not to answer the simplest yes or no question and also refuse to address the actual issues I attempted to raise in a civilized manner. You have a nice day, too...
Which has absolutely F*** All to do with the thread.I am not 'preaching to the rest of (you)'; but simply pointing out the undeniable fact that all that voting for the lesser of two evils nonsense has not worked out so well. The Republican party and The Democratic party are merely two wings of the same predatory bird. It is past time for a different approach if we are serious about reclaiming Liberty for ourselves and our posterity.
Sayonara
Actually, the thread is about evading an illegal statute - I was attempting to address the root cause of our problems, including, specifically, the continued unchallenged existence of such statutes.
By your silence on the 'gay' marriage comments, that 'topic drift' must be completely relevant to the original subject of this thread.
You guys have fun with this; I'll keep those pesky principles out of this discussion since they seem to make some of you uncomfortable...
Last edited by Milt; 08-18-2013 at 22:55.
No, your "principles", and your continual table pounding about the "illegal statute", are irrelevant to the discussion of how to interpret the actual statute.
Sayonara
What he is trying to say is, don't interpret, just ignore. Called passive resistance.
Oh, yeah. When it comes to following the law that's probably a first-rate tactic. Probably provide a really effective defense in court, too.
Stella - my best girl ever.
11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010
Don't wanna get shot by the police?
"Stop Resisting Arrest!"
Bailey, you just love to stir the schiess don't you. Do YOU follow ALL laws, no matter how rediculous?? I don't think so. Please stop preaching the tired "I am a good citizen" line. You sound like a good little Govt. toadie. There, I stirred back.
No, I don't always follow every law. But I'm also not a dumbass.
ETA: I'd suggest you think about why what you said in both posts doesn't make a lot of sense. But I know it would be a waste of time...for both of us.
Last edited by Bailey Guns; 08-20-2013 at 13:16.
Stella - my best girl ever.
11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010
Don't wanna get shot by the police?
"Stop Resisting Arrest!"
Ok, try civil disobedience, and no, I'm not gonna think any more about any of it, and I'm not gonna argue with you about it. It's impossible to discuss anything with someone who thinks he is alway's right like you do. Just a waste of my time, and yours. Think what you like, don't mean a hill of beans to anyone, anyway.
Last edited by milwaukeeshaker; 08-20-2013 at 13:26.