Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
Damn, you too.Originally Posted by 68Charger
Next thing you know, there will be a dramatic increase in tragic Dremel accidents... I know my mill sometimes randomly shaves stuff off parts if I'm not careful...
It's not the odds. It's the stakes.
Here is one for ya; person lives out of state buys mags today. Moves to Colorado; date stamps are after July 1. Or I move out of town buy 30 rounders but move back; a year in the future.
Hummm, big issues with this law.
Good gosh, what am I to do with all these pre-July 1, 2013 date stamped pmags?
My Feedback
Credit TFOGGER : Liberals only want things to be "fair and just" if it benefits them.
Credit Zundfolge: The left only supports two "rights"; Buggery and Infanticide.
Credit roberth: List of things Government does best; 1. Steal your money 2. Steal your time 3. Waste the money they stole from you. 4. Waste your time making you ask permission for things you have a natural right to own. "Anyone that thinks the communists won't turn off your power for being on COAR15 is a fucking moron."
that is their business
they are running their risks
you just let them be
enormous issues
Perhaps it will work like our election laws. I intend to move to a gun friendly state, so while visiting there, I buy a bunch of pmags, but then I decide not to. I had the intention honestly, at that brief moment in time to move, but it miraculously fell thru.
Getting people more wound up than a liberal who just lost their welfare check
It's possession of a magazine holding more than 15 rounds which you did not continuously possess since before 7-1-13.
Proving it, without date stamps, not easy for the prosecutor. Proviing it, with date stamps, too easy.
Big issues, yes, but this isn't one of them.
From a prosecutors stand point; maybe not. But how about the cops who decides he wants to enforce it; is he gonna take your word you bought them while you lived out of state? How many people moved into (Colorado) after July 1 with a date stamped on the mag after??? Sounds like a big cluster F'...
Since the burden rest with the prosecution; are they going to use the date stamp for of a conviction?
Last edited by 10mm-man; 08-18-2013 at 20:50.
It doesn't matter into the state from somewhere else. All my guns are illegal in New Jersey. Doesn't matter when or where I got them.
"There are no finger prints under water."
I have no idea if a jury would accept a post 7-1-13 date stamp as proof that a magazine wasn't continuously possessed since before 7-1-13. I would assume that most jurors would, though, since it's not easy to possess something in June, 2013, that wasn't made until July.
I can sort of see some prosecutor needing to produce a witness who can explain Magpul's date-stamp method to the jury, in order to make a date stamp admissible. But I don't see Magpul busting their collective asses trying to cooperate with that.
Where the defendant bought the magazine doesn't even matter once he's possessed it in Colorado, unless I'm badly mis-reading the statute.
Like you said, what a big cluster.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote