Close
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 39
  1. #21
    Machine Gunner th3w01f's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Castle Rock, CO
    Posts
    1,626

    Default

    I'm confused about when this takes effect. Is anything actually being done at the moment or will there be discussions around it?

    I found this on whitehouse.gov.

    "Today, ATF is issuing a new proposed regulation to close this loophole. The proposed rule requires individuals associated with trusts or corporations that acquire these types of weapons to undergo background checks, just as these individuals would if the weapons were registered to them individually. By closing this loophole, the regulation will ensure that machine guns and other particularly dangerous weapons do not end up in the wrong hands."

    The other one is pretty clear.

    "Today, the Administration is announcing a new policy of denying requests to bring military-grade firearms back into the United States to private entities, with only a few exceptions such as for museums. This new policy will help keep military-grade firearms off our streets. "

    Edit: Found this - http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAg...&RIN=1140-AA43 I think this is part of what asmo was talking about.

  2. #22
    Escaped From New York zteknik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    6,269

    Default


    Starting to look more and more like it each time he opens his mouth....
    FHUGETABOUDIT!!!

  3. #23
    Tactical as Fu&% Mr Spooky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    162

    Default

    Once more for me please, I am a little slow sometimes. I got a trust through NFA Guy and my suppressor finally arrived at the class 3 dealer from Liberty. Still have to send in the form 4 and the check. Are these EO's now in effect or will be by time they get around to approving my stamp and I am screwed?
    Last edited by Mr Spooky; 08-29-2013 at 17:00.

  4. #24
    A FUN TITLE asmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Douglas County (Parker)
    Posts
    3,446

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Spooky View Post
    Once more for me please, I am a little slow sometimes. I got a trust through NFA Guy and my suppressor finally arrived at the class 3 dealer from Liberty. Still have to send in the form 4 and the check. Are these EO's now in effect or will be by time they get around to approving my stamp and I am screwed?
    No.. there is still a while before anything is made into policy.. Minimum of 90 days.
    What is my joy if all hands, even the unclean, can reach into it? What is my wisdom, if even the fools can dictate to me? What is my freedom, if all creatures, even the botched and impotent, are my masters? What is my life, if I am but to bow, to agree and to obey?
    -- Ayn Rand, Anthem (Chapter 11)

  5. #25
    Tactical as Fu&% Mr Spooky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    162

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asmo View Post
    No.. there is still a while before anything is made into policy.. Minimum of 90 days.
    Sorry for the barage of questions but I finally saved up enough $ to do this NFA stuff and now this. So is there a chance that nothing will come of this or is it "for sure" and just awaiting the final writing? Will my form 4 get rejected since the wait time for a stamp is almost a year and this will be made into policy by then?
    Thanks for all the help,
    Mike

  6. #26
    The "Godfather" of COAR Great-Kazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Washboard Alley, AZ.
    Posts
    48,079

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Spooky View Post
    Sorry for the barage of questions but I finally saved up enough $ to do this NFA stuff and now this. So is there a chance that nothing will come of this or is it "for sure" and just awaiting the final writing? Will my form 4 get rejected since the wait time for a stamp is almost a year and this will be made into policy by then?
    Thanks for all the help,
    Mike

    When you call, make sure you get name, date, time you called. This way you have a reference point, IF you need to call again, OR they contact you.


    How to Contact Us:

    You may contact us at:
    244 Needy Road
    Martinsburg, WV 25405

    Phone: 304 616-4500
    Fax: 304 616-4501

    Hours: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday (except federal holidays)
    The Great Kazoo's Feedback

    "when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".

  7. #27
    Guest
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    centennial
    Posts
    75

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeusExMachina View Post
    Last I checked, I got background checks every time I took possession of my NFA trust items.
    They want a background check on every trustee and beneficiary every time property is added to the trust or a new trustee/beneficiary is added -- just like the new CO law.

  8. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asmo View Post
    The fingerprints/BCG for Trust members has been an ongoing discussion between the ATF and the American Silencer Association, and it was first getting press coverage last year (we had a thread on it before the crash).

    The tit-for-tat is that in exchange for not requiring LEO sign-off for NFA toys, that trust/corp members would be subject to background checks. The rationale was that people were making trusts/corps to get around LEO sign-off -- so take away the LEO sign-off requirement and there is 'no reason' to have a Trust anymore.

    Hit the nail on the head. The board members at the American Silencer Association have been discussing this with the BATFE for quite some time and they believed it would hit at some point this year. From everything they have told me it does not change anything for any transfers or making forms in process before the regulation goes into effect. The BATFE will have to issue new forms which in itself takes a good deal of time. This is coming but I expect it is down the road a little ways.

  9. #29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by us1911 View Post
    They want a background check on every trustee and beneficiary every time property is added to the trust or a new trustee/beneficiary is added -- just like the new CO law.
    I am not sure they have laid that part out yet. If they handle it like an FFL application and have you designate responsible persons which is what the proposed rules says then they may have you background check each responsible person for the first item but not subsequent items unless there is a change in responsible persons but like I said they have not really laid that out yet that I know of.

  10. #30
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    denver
    Posts
    1,834

    Default

    heres the thing, i wouldn't use the "loophole" if the damned police chiefs would freaking sign off on me having an sbr and suppressor. in fact, id prefer to have it in my name. gives me some flexibility. but most won't even consider it or discuss it. as such, loopholes are created. force the chief to sign off if i pass a background check and i will happily do it that way.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •