Close
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 43

Thread: backround check

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    westminster, co
    Posts
    524

    Default backround check

    Do you think the hoplophobes would still think the universal backround check is a good idea if the requirement to record the serial number, and make of the gun were removed from the check? Has anyone proposed this idea? I for one am not afraid of backround checks, but am quite sure these are for backdoor gun registration. There is no reason to find out the backround of the firearm.

  2. #2
    Looking Elsewhere
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    The Peoples Republic (Boulder)
    Posts
    3,140

    Default

    That would ruin the whole reason why they want background checks in the first place.. It's one step closer to full registration.

  3. #3
    High Power Shooter Rabid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Centennial
    Posts
    967

    Default


  4. #4
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,530

    Default

    Why compromise? I resent being told I have to pay for a background check in order to return a rifle to a US soldier after she completes her tour of duty overseas despite knowing her husband for over a decade and despite the fact they both undergo periodic background checks already (and more rigorous ones than CBI or NICS do). I resent the idea that I should have to do background checks in order to loan a friend some rifles in order to conduct training for our Boy Scout classes. In short, I resent stupid useless laws that don't do anything positive and will not compromise my position in order to make some stupid granola-eating empathetic hoplophobic idiot "feel better".

  5. #5
    GLOCK HOOKER hurley842002's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    8,017

    Default Re: backround check

    Quote Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter View Post
    Why compromise? I resent being told I have to pay for a background check in order to return a rifle to a US soldier after she completes her tour of duty overseas despite knowing her husband for over a decade and despite the fact they both undergo periodic background checks already (and more rigorous ones than CBI or NICS do). I resent the idea that I should have to do background checks in order to loan a friend some rifles in order to conduct training for our Boy Scout classes. In short, I resent stupid useless laws that don't do anything positive and will not compromise my position in order to make some stupid granola-eating empathetic hoplophobic idiot "feel better".
    Well said!

    No compromise PERIOD!

  6. #6
    Zombie Slayer Zundfolge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wichita, KS (formerly COS)
    Posts
    8,317

    Default

    I agree, no compromise.

    I suspect that the "compromise" we will be offered in a couple years is a means of getting around the annoying BGC for private purchases will be an FOID card. To that I say FUCK THAT NOISE.

    We need to fight to get the universal BGC law repealed, not give those bastards a victory by just nibbling around the edges of it.
    Modern liberalism is based on the idea that reality is obligated to conform to one's beliefs because; "I have the right to believe whatever I want".

    "Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen.
    -Friedrich Nietzsche

    "Every time something really bad happens, people cry out for safety, and the government answers by taking rights away from good people."
    -Penn Jillette

    A World Without Guns <- Great Read!

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    westminster, co
    Posts
    524

    Default

    I agree, no compromise! I do NOT like BGC's at all! All gun laws are unconstitutional. I'm just really surprised someone in the forefront of the pro-gun movement has not pinned one of the anti's down on film by proposing that no gun numbers should be required just in order to get the response of the anti's recorded for all to see. That would show their true colors, and intent.
    Last edited by milwaukeeshaker; 09-11-2013 at 19:10.

  8. #8
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,899

    Default

    We have drawn a line in this state.




    Thou shalt not pass.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  9. #9
    Fleeing Idaho to get IKEA Bailey Guns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Oklahoma
    Posts
    16,452
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by milwaukeeshaker View Post
    Do you think the hoplophobes would still think the universal backround check is a good idea if the requirement to record the serial number, and make of the gun were removed from the check? Has anyone proposed this idea? I for one am not afraid of backround checks, but am quite sure these are for backdoor gun registration. There is no reason to find out the backround of the firearm.
    Why would someone want to propose something that's already done?

    Firearm serial numbers are not part of either the CBI or NICS checks. Serial numbers are recorded on the 4473...they are not provided with background check info.
    Stella - my best girl ever.
    11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010



    Don't wanna get shot by the police?
    "Stop Resisting Arrest!"


  10. #10
    Looking Elsewhere
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    The Peoples Republic (Boulder)
    Posts
    3,140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bailey Guns View Post
    Why would someone want to propose something that's already done?

    Firearm serial numbers are not part of either the CBI or NICS checks. Serial numbers are recorded on the 4473...they are not provided with background check info.
    Perhaps the question should have been.. "Why don't we go for background checks and do away with the 4473?" Seeing that the 4473 eventually becomes part of the national registry once the FFL closes shop and turns in their records.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •