Quote Originally Posted by hatidua View Post
I just zipped up my flame suit so here goes:

Would the $256 be better spent via one of the organizations fighting to retain 2A rights instead of a 'nanny-nanny-boo-boo' ad that will do little other than energize the anti-2A crowd to turn up to the polls if a recall occurs in the future?

OK, crawling into hole while wearing flame suit....
Quote Originally Posted by BPTactical View Post
^^^^ this
As much as we would love to go:"Nana nana boo boo, you got it in the poo poo" we are best suited gearing up for the big fight in '14.

Real winners win with dignity and grace.
We let our ballots speak and they spoke loud and clear.
No need to say more.
Quote Originally Posted by XC700116 View Post
IDK, I have a hard time giving money to a liberal rag that's done absolutely everything they can to go against us at every turn, especially when they will probably twist it up before they print it, or just kick it back anyway. The money would be better spent going after the next A-hole on the list for recall IMO. If we can get together and keep going, recalling more political whores, that will give them a MUCH bigger F-You, gain more support and attention, and be overall much more productive to the cause than any full page add in a rag like the NYT. Not to mention help to continue to drain their political funds. Hell look how much they spent losing this time around.

I'm with these three.
It isn't being polite. Not taunting is not riling up their base.
It is saving for our next battle.
That's just my personal opinion as well.