Pistol Recoil Management Through Stance?

[Irving]

This may work while shooting from a static position but, whether you are practicing your shooting skills for dynamic action pistol competition or doing so for tactical applications, you will soon learn that this shooting position negatively impacts movement.

This is definitely something that I do when I'm drawing at home, so very static indeed. Usually anything I practice at home.goes out the window during competitions. It is a very long time before I am able to successfully integrate new techniques.

[Gravy Sandwich]

I currently shoot with what I would call modified isosceles, shoulders square to target, push forward with right hand and pull backwards with left hand and keeping elbows slightly bent, all while slightly leaning forward with my torso.

Push/pull is a characteristic of the Weaver stance. Isosceles uses extended arms and your body weight to absorb recoil. Recoil is absorbed through the torso, not the arms. Ron Avery explains the difference in this video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GewbIC2P8Hw
Cory is a better student than instructor. Here's Ron increasing his draw speed by almost a half a second by minimizing his sluggish press-out. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMSlCyc-SQQ

[275RLTW]

Push/pull is a characteristic of the Weaver stance. Isosceles uses extended arms and your body weight to absorb recoil. Recoil is absorbed through the torso, not the arms. Ron Avery explains the difference in this video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GewbIC2P8Hw
Cory is a better student than instructor. Here's Ron increasing his draw speed by almost a half a second by minimizing his sluggish press-out. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMSlCyc-SQQ

^^This. Cory is an ass clown with no experience. Stop trying to learn from youtube.

[tmleadr03]

I just shoot from the hip. Well, kinda.

Here is one of my training videos.

http://themetapicture.com/media/funn...ooting-gun.gif

[Buff]

I just shoot from the hip. Well, kinda.

Here is one of my training videos.

http://themetapicture.com/media/funn...ooting-gun.gif

[BuffCyclist]

These two clowns have as much credibility as anyone else on YouTube, if you want to improve your pistol shooting you might want to look to those who are using techniques that are proven. One place to prove techniques is in competition, here are a few pictures to get you started http://www.gunnuts.net/2013/07/08/ex...ooting-stance/

Thats kind of what I was wanting to hear. Are they actually teaching valid points or is it bogus? I've watched a lot of IPSC/USPSA videos and have noticed how they shoot. I saw the video I originally posted and thought it could have some valid points, so I wanted to ask around.

You said you want to shoot faster and more accurately. Accuracy is easy to measure, how close are your groups to the bullseye? Faster is where a timer comes in. Shot timers are around. Unfortunanty they cost more than they should (like $100). This is the only way I have found to test wether or not some new technique "works" for me. In this case you would shoot a string of shots (like six to ten) and look at your accuracy and total time. Are you faster and more accurate holding your elbows a certain way? Well then, that is the way to go. Hope that helps.
Also, as an aside, today at the range I discovered my big problem with controling recoil is not gripping the pistol hard enough. I have been shooting a lot of .22 and it turns out when using a real gun I am not holding it hard enough.

What I meant was, I want to shoot faster accurately. I would say I'm a pretty decent shot, but most of the time I only shoot at a rate of about once per second. When working on SD skills, I do shoot faster than that but then, my accuracy is defined as on the silhouette target or a miss.

Push/pull is a characteristic of the Weaver stance. Isosceles uses extended arms and your body weight to absorb recoil. Recoil is absorbed through the torso, not the arms. Ron Avery explains the difference in this video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GewbIC2P8Hw
Cory is a better student than instructor. Here's Ron increasing his draw speed by almost a half a second by minimizing his sluggish press-out. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMSlCyc-SQQ

Couldn't rmember where I got that push/pull aspect, but twisting my body like a weaver is not comfortable for me, so I square my shoulders. Recoil travels through the arms to get to the shoulders/torso, so what they're talking about in the video kind of makes sense. If you replace your arms with shocks/springs, you will feel less of a sharp impact in your torso, so the idea of bending elbows outwards makes sense in theory.

^^This. Cory is an ass clown with no experience. Stop trying to learn from youtube.

This is the frank type of reply I wanted . Of the millions of youtube videos out there on firearms, I like finding some who have quite a few videos so I can watch them back to back without having to search in between.

However, on that last part, I might as well stop reading forums for information and learning too, because no one online has verifiable experience. [/sarcasm]. How else do you increase your shooting skills and training drills if you can't hear of them from places.

I just shoot from the hip. Well, kinda.
Here is one of my training videos.

http://themetapicture.com/media/funn...ooting-gun.gif

I guess what I'm taking away from here is stop watching youtube and just go shooting.

[Ronin13]

^^This. Cory is an ass clown with no experience. Stop trying to learn from youtube.

Not to mention, and this is probably new info for some- the slide catch (no that's what it's called on a Glock) shouldn't be used as a "slide release"... many guns (M&Ps, XDs, Glocks, and others) the only function that slide catch has is to catch the slide, not release it. Sig is the only one I'm directly aware of (there could be more) that it actually is a slide release. This information is coming from a retired Arvada PD officer/instructor/armorer, so I put some stock into it, take it however you like.

[BuffCyclist]

Not to mention, and this is probably new info for some- the slide catch (no that's what it's called on a Glock) shouldn't be used as a "slide release"... many guns (M&Ps, XDs, Glocks, and others) the only function that slide catch has is to catch the slide, not release it. Sig is the only one I'm directly aware of (there could be more) that it actually is a slide release. This information is coming from a retired Arvada PD officer/instructor/armorer, so I put some stock into it, take it however you like.

Oh trust me, I know this. I have gotten into the habit of using the slide stop on my Glock as a slide release and now that I have an M&P and the design does not allow it to be used as a slide release, I'm kicking myself for falling into that habit. I'm doing a ton of dry fire and magazine swaps in my Glock to try and overcome the temptation to use it as such.

[MAP]

Not to mention, and this is probably new info for some- the slide catch (no that's what it's called on a Glock) shouldn't be used as a "slide release"... many guns (M&Ps, XDs, Glocks, and others) the only function that slide catch has is to catch the slide, not release it. Sig is the only one I'm directly aware of (there could be more) that it actually is a slide release. This information is coming from a retired Arvada PD officer/instructor/armorer, so I put some stock into it, take it however you like.

Glock would disagree with that statement. You can use it as a slide release. There are many misconceptions about using the "slingshot" vs "slide catch". In the end, use what works for you.

Mike