Close
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    Viewer Discretion is Advised! UrbanWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Not Detriot yet, Ohio
    Posts
    1,696

    Default 11 sheriffs still remain on the gun laws lawsuit

    An update from Sheriff Justin Smith confirms that Judge Krieger did cut the list down to 11 Sheriffs who provided proof in the earlier filings that they were going to be term-limited in the next year and would be subject to prosecution for their ownership of magazines exceeding 15 rounds.

  2. #2
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Castle Rock, Colorado
    Posts
    728

    Default

    Good stuff. All you need is one so I don't think the number really matters all that much. I really think this is our best chance at getting these laws overturned. Is this only for mag capacity or is the background check included here too?

  3. #3
    Machine Gunner muddywings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    CO Springs
    Posts
    1,547

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UrbanWolf View Post
    subject to prosecution for their ownership of magazines exceeding 15 rounds.
    I don't understand this part. Can anybody elaborate?
    Just curious.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    "The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot confirm their validity." -Abraham Lincoln

  4. #4
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Sheriffs in their LEO capacity are not restricted to 15 rounds, so what do they have to complain about?
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  5. #5
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Castle Rock, Colorado
    Posts
    728

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by muddywings View Post
    I don't understand this part. Can anybody elaborate?
    Just curious.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Once their term is up, then they are limited to 15. 11 of them are term limited thus 11 of them can proceed. The others will be LEOs still and have no grounds... According to the judge.

  6. #6

    Default

    Basically, they're saying that any magazines they buy now will not be allowed after their term and they will be criminals.

    Sent from my teepee using smoke signals.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    Sheriffs in their LEO capacity are not restricted to 15 rounds, so what do they have to complain about?
    Normally I agree with you and your comments.... But this is frustrating.
    Maybe they should just give up? Fuck your rights and all that...

    You don't need anything over 15 rounds, so what do you have to complain about?

    Come on man...

    Sent from my teepee using smoke signals.

  8. #8
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I was answering the question.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    I was answering the question.
    Now that I read it like 12 times I see it.....

    Sent from my teepee using smoke signals.

  10. #10
    High Power Shooter Rabid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Centennial
    Posts
    967

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KAPA View Post
    Good stuff. All you need is one so I don't think the number really matters all that much. I really think this is our best chance at getting these laws overturned. Is this only for mag capacity or is the background check included here too?
    Both are in the lawsuit.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •