You gotta lay off the Purple Pony powder before bedtime there Ridge.

A-the Gov has no right to mandate an individual to purchase a product.
B-the Gov has no right to interject itself into a Dr/patient relationship.
C-the Gov has no right deciding what care an individual shall receive.
D-as already proven, it is a job killer.
E-expense:-the cost associated with the program have gone from IIRC 45 mil projected to over 3 billion and will likely go up from there.
F-"you can keep your current health plan and Dr." a lie that is already coming to fruition.
G- kills free market competition in healthcare which is critical to progress in the medical field.
H- the Gov has no right to limit what an individual can earn, Dr salaries are capped under the ACA.
I-expense-millions have received notice from their current carrier that premiums will increase 40-120%.
J- administrators have no place in deciding who shall receive what treatment and when "death panels" (a reality)
K- maybe I missed it, but I don't recall ever seeing where healthcare is a "Right".


As already noted, if this is such a wonderful thing, why have so many attempted to be waived exempt or receive subsidy for it?

Let's look back to how it was implemented.
A-behind closed doors(but this is "the most transparent administration" isn't it?)
B- "you have to pass it to see what's in it."
C-back door dealings to get support and enough votes to pass it (Nebraska and Louisiana come to mind)
D-as we have seen so well in our state with other legislation, the elected representatives did not consider their constituents input.
E- a SCOTUS judge was clearly leveraged into ruling in favor of it (unclear as to exactly how but it is clear Roberts had a sudden change of heart)