Close
Page 14 of 16 FirstFirst ... 4910111213141516 LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 160
  1. #131
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Ronin, if AA didn't pass, weed would still be taxed and regulated, it just wouldn't have an additional 15% tax arbitrarily added to the base tax. Don't compare to gas, tobacco, and alcohol. The government flat out steals monry from the consumers on gasoline. Tobacco and alcohol are already taxed too high on their own. They are not a fitting example, and certainly not justification for what AA called for.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  2. #132
    Stircrazy Jer jerrymrc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    8,166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    Ronin, if AA didn't pass, weed would still be taxed and regulated, it just wouldn't have an additional 15% tax arbitrarily added to the base tax. Don't compare to gas, tobacco, and alcohol. The government flat out steals monry from the consumers on gasoline. Tobacco and alcohol are already taxed too high on their own. They are not a fitting example, and certainly not justification for what AA called for.
    And the rate on weed is? over and above the normal sales tax. I honestly do not know but if it has no additional tax then it needed it. 15% is chump change compared to the $1 a pack Colorado levied a few years ago on cigarettes. They claimed that it would drastically reduce smoking but it did not and in all honesty they do not want us to kill the cash cow.

    I can't smoke weed even under the MMJ because I work for the fed. Too old to do so now anyway but just like cigs it is a bad thing. Any smoke inhaled is a bad thing to the body. So after years of being victimized/marginalized because I am a nasty, bad smoker that make all the mothers hide there children and the butt of jokes by the younger subjects we make pot legal and the crowd goes wild. Guess what? What is good for the goose is good for the gander. Still think they should make it all legal. but then I got my hand slapped by a judge 37 years ago for saying that.

    I still don't understand what all the stink is since when I was a teenager and where I grew up it was only a traffic ticket for under an OZ back then.

    Just my take on it..
    I see you running, tell me what your running from

    Nobody's coming, what ya do that was so wrong.

  3. #133
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jerrymrc View Post
    And the rate on weed is? over and above the normal sales tax.
    Are you asking what the tax rate on weed sales will be? I feel like I'm missing the tone of this sentence. Don't forget that weed isn't limited to being smoked anymore.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  4. #134
    Stircrazy Jer jerrymrc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    8,166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    Are you asking what the tax rate on weed sales will be? I feel like I'm missing the tone of this sentence. Don't forget that weed isn't limited to being smoked anymore.
    What I was asking was when the law passed what tax over and above the normal sales tax was enacted? It was voted on to tax at 15% but the message I get is that passing the legality had no additional tax on it in the first place. Am I correct?
    I see you running, tell me what your running from

    Nobody's coming, what ya do that was so wrong.

  5. #135
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    From all of the griping and talk of 'black market' sales, it appears to me that those advocating that we should make pot a taxable commodity were disingenuous. They were willing to sell it illegally before, why should we think that the pattern would change? You can dye the fur on the leopard, but the spots are still there.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  6. #136
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jerrymrc View Post
    What I was asking was when the law passed what tax over and above the normal sales tax was enacted? It was voted on to tax at 15% but the message I get is that passing the legality had no additional tax on it in the first place. Am I correct?
    I believe so. AA was to set the "sales tax" portion at 10% in order to cover regular sales tax and fund regulation. There will be an additional 15% tax on the sale, to fund school construction; for a total tax of 25%. The bill specified that the tax amount of either portion of the tax may be changed for any reason, not to.exceed 15% each.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  7. #137
    Sig Fantastic Ronin13's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    10,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    Ronin, if AA didn't pass, weed would still be taxed and regulated, it just wouldn't have an additional 15% tax arbitrarily added to the base tax. Don't compare to gas, tobacco, and alcohol. The government flat out steals monry from the consumers on gasoline. Tobacco and alcohol are already taxed too high on their own. They are not a fitting example, and certainly not justification for what AA called for.
    I never said it wouldn't be taxed, I was more saying the taxes on it should be independent of everything else. And why can't I compare weed tax to gas, tobacco, and booze? They're taxed really high- which is the goal for Pro-AA folks on weed. I see a perfect correlation.
    "There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
    "The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."

  8. #138
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Because those aren't acceptable taxes either. Just because one product has an unacceptable tax rate, doesn't mean that more should.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  9. #139
    Machine Gunner Jeffrey Lebowski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    1,615

    Default

    What is an "acceptable tax rate?"

    Believe me, I look at how every proposal will affect my own pocketbook and vote accordingly, but how do you frame up any discussion around something so arbitrary and subjective?

  10. #140
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Acceptable is whatever the local tax base rate is. If the local tax rate on consumables is 7.25%, then what is the justification of having the weed be taxed at 25%? Oh yeah, for "regulation" and building schools for the kids.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •