Honestly I'd chip in $50-100 toward a PI, just to dig through that photographer's life a little bit.
People like that always have some dirt they would prefer not go public. Say in big bold letters on a sign standing next to them.
Honestly I'd chip in $50-100 toward a PI, just to dig through that photographer's life a little bit.
People like that always have some dirt they would prefer not go public. Say in big bold letters on a sign standing next to them.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem. --TJ
Someone ask that chick holding the sign why she likes and approves of unopposed rape.
It is safe to assume they have friends reading this thread. This is an open forum that does not require a membership to view threads, and the gun grabbers are aware of it.
Me too!
I can't find anything in the Statute about photographing (and maybe later publishing?) someone without their consent in a public place. I would be worried that people photoed would be put up somewhere on some website without permission and targeted because of their pro-2A stance. Seems shady, although not altogether illegal. I wouldn't like it, and would probably pursue civil matters if something came of it.
"There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
"The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."
"There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
"The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."
When Brett Kimberlin sent a photographer to try to intimidate some conservative bloggers at a blogger bash, it turned out the photographer he sent was a convicted child pornographer.
Sayonara