Close
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: WWP anti gun?

  1. #1
    Gong Shooter jhirsh5280's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Stapleton
    Posts
    487

    Default WWP anti gun?

    I was sent this link by a friend today and was intrigued.

    http://www.examiner.com/article/woun...nti-gun-stance

    “While we appreciate the interest in having a WWP representative on your show on Veterans Day we are not able to participate in interviews or activities with media/organizations that are related to firearms,”
    I understand that at the end of the day this foundation is helping and supporting our combat veterans and that's ultimately more important than their stance on guns. However if they are receiving donations from gun and gun related companies I wonder how they will react when learning of this. Could it be that they dont necessarily care about their stance because, as I mentioned earlier its about the Vets not the guns? Is this a new stance from WWP? Is this a fake article? Is the moon really made of cheese?

    Interested to see what other think.
    "A wise man recognizes that although he cannot always control what happens to him, he can always control how he reacts to his failures. As long as he keeps his faith in God and in himself, nothing can permanently defeat him."

  2. #2
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,566

    Default

    In before jim's repost-of-a-repost comment!

    I think you need to look at a wide variety of material before you pass judgment. WWP definitely helps a LOT of vets. After e-mailing them last year about this issue and the high compensation their CEO takes, my conclusion is that this particular complaint is a mixture of some WWP flunkies making a bad call or succumbing to political correctness, WWP not clarifying their position well enough, and some people deliberately misconstruing WWP's stance. They are obviously not anti-firearm as WWP defenders will note they have had and continue to have activities for vets that are associated with firearms but there ARE organizations or businesses that might be counterproductive for them to associate with. As an example, would anyone here blamed them or accused them of being anti-2A if they had refused to associate with Rich Wyatt?

    Having said all that, I'm still somewhat concerned by the percentage they spend on advertising, fundraising, paying their CEO, etc. I shifted the money that was going to go to WWP over to The Home Front Cares, The Leonidas Project, and others.

  3. #3
    Gong Shooter jhirsh5280's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Stapleton
    Posts
    487

    Default

    Apologies, my message board etiquette is a bit rusty.

    Im in not passing judgement just curious considering the vets and generous donators on this board.
    Last edited by jhirsh5280; 11-04-2013 at 16:25.
    "A wise man recognizes that although he cannot always control what happens to him, he can always control how he reacts to his failures. As long as he keeps his faith in God and in himself, nothing can permanently defeat him."

  4. #4
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    Semper Fi Fund FTMFW

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •