In before jim's repost-of-a-repost comment!

I think you need to look at a wide variety of material before you pass judgment. WWP definitely helps a LOT of vets. After e-mailing them last year about this issue and the high compensation their CEO takes, my conclusion is that this particular complaint is a mixture of some WWP flunkies making a bad call or succumbing to political correctness, WWP not clarifying their position well enough, and some people deliberately misconstruing WWP's stance. They are obviously not anti-firearm as WWP defenders will note they have had and continue to have activities for vets that are associated with firearms but there ARE organizations or businesses that might be counterproductive for them to associate with. As an example, would anyone here blamed them or accused them of being anti-2A if they had refused to associate with Rich Wyatt?

Having said all that, I'm still somewhat concerned by the percentage they spend on advertising, fundraising, paying their CEO, etc. I shifted the money that was going to go to WWP over to The Home Front Cares, The Leonidas Project, and others.