Well we know DHS has enough ammo for them...
One the flip side, could the same argument against arming TSA be used for us, the common citizen?
Dear TSA,
You are not POST certified. You are not 'officers' in any law enforcement sense of the word. You have no law enforcement duty whatsoever
IMO, Arming them / actual firearm certification would lead to removal, or resigning of a decent portion of borderline FSA types.
The Great Kazoo's Feedback
"when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".
An interesting thought, would having POST certified TSA personnel run foul of the 4th amendment?
Thread title says it all.
This is a necessary step to increase span of control. You will also see scope creep in the TSA's mission to include rail and highways--maybe eventually schools and places of employment that are deemed high risk.
Wonder why the Liberals hate "stand your ground?" Because outside of the home, they want their boots to be the only ones with guns. Stand ground creates a legal right to use force that threatens a very fragile span of control model...
Remember obama wants a civilian police force that is as well prepared and armed as the military
Last edited by rockhound; 11-05-2013 at 11:28.
Self control: The minds ability to override the body's urge to beat the living sh.. out of some ass.... who desperately deserves it.
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
Thomas Jefferson
Obama, so full of crap it is a miracle Air Force One can even get off the ground,
TSA on TSA crime so now we need elite TSA to protect us from other TSA. Oh joy.
We need to get the TSA employees pilot's licenses and they can fly and protect at the same time.
Lessons cost money. Good ones cost lots. -Tony Beets