Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums
Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
Do you know how hard it was for me to click "insert image"?
IMO, there's no reason on Earth to support what they did to him! Not even a little bit. Even a ticket for the original piddly traffic infraction would have been uncalled for. Failure to signal when leaving a WalMart parking lot led to all this? Suspicion of a 63 year old guy smuggling drugs in his ass?Originally Posted by DavieD55
There's a lot more of us ugly mf'ers out here than there are of you pretty people!
- Frank Zappa
Scrotum Diem - bag the day!
It's all shits and giggles until someone giggles and shits.....
One thing is for certain though, officers didn't find a buttload of drugs on that night. On a serious note, Hope all who participated in this are held responsible for their crimes.
Last edited by DavieD55; 11-07-2013 at 05:00.
duder.
dont like the drug laws well get them changed. until then they were just doing their jobs. they are blameless. take it up with their bosses and the politicians!
thank goodness the guy didn't resist, and just took it like a man! Else the cops would have been put in danger and may have not gone home safe that night. we all have to be thankful for that! after all if the officer is injured in his job, who will protect everyone else while they sleep?!?!
sounds like some of you should sign the eff up and help, maybe try and change the system from within. else ya know, somolia is waiting for you anarchists!!!!
PS even if there are other similar things that happened, well those people are just looking to be paid. so they are probably liars and cop haters. And even if there was another one, or two or three, they are still isolated incidents (tm)
Last edited by lowbeyond; 11-07-2013 at 09:54.
link to warrant (pdf)
http://www.popehat.com/wp-content/up...ert-1-2-13.pdf
1. I Officer Robert Chavez was contacted by Sgt Detective Orosco in reference to a brown 1998 Dodge pick- up truck that failed to stop at the posted stop sign at the intersection of Deming Del-Sol and Pine Street.
2. I was traveling East bound on Pine Street and did locate the brown 1998 Dodge pick-up traveling West bound on Pine Street from Deming del-Sol.
3. I conducted a traffic stop with the brown 1998 Dodge pick-up displaying New Mexico JGS-31l with a VIN#3B7KC26Z9WM2742SS in the parking lot of 1021 E. Pine Street (Wal-Mart) parking lot.
4. I approached the driver who was later identified as David W. Eckert and informed him for the reason for the stop.
5. While speaking with Mr. Eckert I did notice that he was avoiding eye contact with me as I asked him for his driver's license, registration and proof of insurance.
6. As Mr. Eckert handed me the documents that were requested I did notice his left hand began to shake at which time I had Mr. Eckert step out of the vehicle. Once outside of the vehicle Mr. Eckert was asked if he had any weapons or anything else that might harm me which he stated "no".
7. I then conducted a Terry Pat Down on Mr. Eckert's person to search for any weapons which none were found.
8. While Mr. Eckert was standing outside of the vehicle I did notice his posture to be erect and he kept his legs together. A short time later I informed Mr. Eckert that a uniformed patrol Officer was coming to issue him a citation for the stop sign violation.
9. Officer Villegas did arrive and issued Mr. Eckert his citation for stop sign violation.
10. Mr. Eckert was then informed that he was free to go.
11. As Mr. Eckert turned to walk back towards his vehicle, I asked him for verbal consent to search his vehicle for any illegal narcotics andlor weapons at that time he did give consent.
12. I then asked Mr. Eckert if! could search his person for any illegal narcotics and/or weapons. At that time he stated that he had a problem with me searching his person.
13. I then informed Mr. Eckert that an open air search was going to be conducted on the vehicle and reminded him that he had given verbal consent to search his vehicle as well.
14. Hidalgo CountyK-9 Officer walked his K-9 around the vehicle which the K-9 alerted to the driver's side of the vehicle. A short time later the K-9 made entry into the cab of the vehicle and once again alerted to the driver's side seat.
15. Mr. Eckert was then informed of the K -9 alerting to the seat and was informed that a search warrant was going to be obtained. Hidalgo County K-9 Officer did inform me that he had dealt with Mr. Eckert on a previous case and stated that Mr. Eckert was known to insert drugs into his anal cavity and had been caught in Hidalgo County with drugs in his anal cavity.
16. Mr. Eckert was then placed into investigated detention and was transported to the Deming Police Department.
17. Mr. Eckert's vehicle was tagged for evidence and was later transferred to the Deming Police Department's impound lot awaiting a search warrant.
18. At approximately 140 I hrs~ I contacted DDA Dougherty and informed of the incident. DDA Dougherty did approve pursuit of a search warrant for Mr. Eckert's vehicle and also for Mr. Eckert's person to include Mr. Eckert's anal cavity.
BS, Only Following Orders does not cut it. And if it does, then god help us all.
[QUOTE=lowbeyond;1397917]
7. I then conducted a Terry Pat Down on Mr. Eckert's person to search for any weapons which none were found.
8. While Mr. Eckert was standing outside of the vehicle I did notice his posture to be erect and he kept his legs together. A short time later I informed Mr. Eckert that a uniformed patrol Officer was coming to issue him a citation for the stop sign violation.
9. Officer Villegas did arrive and issued Mr. Eckert his citation for stop sign violation.
10. Mr. Eckert was then informed that he was free to go.
11. I then decided to fuck Mr. Eckert in the ass. Literally.
Are you sure about that? I mean it didn't really work as an excuse in the past. But it sure does now, doesn't it....
Senior citizen with shakey hands? I don't believe it for a second.
"There are no finger prints under water."
A list of his past criminal record reveals this. Appears that Eckert is a habitual drug user and possible drug dealer. Genuine dirtbag.
Still doesn't excuse the treatment he received. Not in the US. I'm the farthest thing away from a cop hater. Never been a leo and likely never will be. I guess I would frame it this way. Don't like constitutional protections in place to protect the citizens of this country from abuse by the very people entrusted with power to protect us then why don't you work to change the constitution. It doesn't make a person to be a cop hater to be concerned with over zealous cops. Wasn't the first time it happened either. LEO's need to operate above board and 99% of the officers I have been in contact with have been. I can only hope that the majority of leo's reactions to this mess is to recognize that this is a symptom of a serious problem.A records search for David W. Eckert’s past criminal history returns several results. The most recent drug-related arrest appears to have been in 2012. A section on the record, however, says the case was “dismissed by prosecutor.”
He was charged with possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine), a felony, in the case. The state of New Mexico entered a “nolle prosequie” motion, meaning it found it was not in the state’s best interest to prosecute, according to court records.
In 2008, he was charged with felony possession of a controlled substance and misdemeanor use or possession of drug paraphernalia. He pled guilty and a judge granted him a “conditional discharge” with the stipulation of 18 months supervised probation, records indicate.
In 2005, Eckert was charged with felony possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute in a school zone and misdemeanor use or possession of drug paraphernalia. The case was ultimately dismissed by the prosecutor after it went to trial and the defense entered an “alibi or entrapment” defense.
Finally, in 2002, Eckert was charged with forgery, possession of a controlled substance with the intent to distribute and use or possession of drug paraphernalia. Each count was apparently “dismissed” by the prosecutor after the state of new Mexico again entered a “nolle prosequie” motion.
Though Eckert has had other legal issues going back to 1999, they involved debt, divorce and other financial issues.
Maybe you are familiar with the famous quote, "It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer". A sentiment echoed by our founding fathers. Those officers had a choice and they chose to go overboard ultimately violating his rights. Just my opinion. Not the type of people I want enforcing the law. I guess that the justice system will have the final say on whether or not my opinion is correct. I'm content with that.
To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
