Colorado laws and Hi-Cap Mags

[BlasterBob]

No, that's what the girl told me.

[mahkcod]

Is this the "aquantance" of which you speak?

[UrbanWolf]

^^^^

My balls just fleed up to my body cavity....

[osok-308]

There is no straight answer. A strict reading of the text is that a Colorado resident cannot transfer a >15 round magazine to anyone. Silly as that is.
And strictly speaking, Colorado can create such a crime (ignoring for the moment, arguments that >15 round magazines are protected under Heller/McDonald ).

Yep. Heller mentions guns I'm common use. Last time I checked, XD, glock, fnp, ar-15s, etc are all in common use and can take mags >15 rounds. This bogus new law should have been tossed out.

[Great-Kazoo]

Yep. Heller mentions guns I'm common use. Last time I checked, XD, glock, fnp, ar-15s, etc are all in common use and can take mags >15 rounds. This bogus new law should have been tossed out.

it should have never been signed. However as Hick said on the mike rosen show, when pressed. "It's Not a good law, or one i agree with, BUT WE HAD TO DO SOMETHING"
That statement also reflects the mentality of D's and liberals. WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING. Why? is my question.

Which can also cross post in the tea Party is wounded thread, when some inquire why the R's can't be more "inclusive" like the D's

[osok-308]

it should have never been signed. However as Hick said on the mike rosen show, when pressed. "It's Not a good law, or one i agree with, BUT WE HAD TO DO SOMETHING"
That statement also reflects the mentality of D's and liberals. WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING. Why? is my question.

Which can also cross post in the tea Party is wounded thread, when some inquire why the R's can't be more "inclusive" like the D's

Yeah, the "we had to do something" argument is total BS. if they are going to use that argument, they should at least finish the sentence "we had to do something TO MAKE US FEEL BETTER AND SHIFT THE BLAME FOR CRIME TO INANIMATE OBJECTS."

[Great-Kazoo]

Yeah, the "we had to do something" argument is total BS. if they are going to use that argument, they should at least finish the sentence "we had to do something TO MAKE US FEEL BETTER AND SHIFT THE BLAME FOR CRIME TO INANIMATE OBJECTS."

Hey man this is a discussion about the law, not a common sense web site.

[Circuits]

It's Not a good law, or one i agree with, BUT WE HAD TO DO SOMETHING"
That statement also reflects the mentality of D's and liberals. WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING. Why? is my question.

More importantly, why isn't the something ever something like "throw a pizza party at the capitol to promote awareness" instead of "enact a law based on our fears?"

[UrbanWolf]

More importantly, why isn't the something ever something like "throw a pizza party at the capitol to promote awareness" instead of "enact a law based on our fears?"

Make too much sense, don't cost enough...

[DaBull]

I have some CO-grandfathered magazines (30 rounders) that I would like to transfer to someone out of state. A year ago, the consensus in this thread was that this law is poorly written with respect to this possibility. Specifically, the law prohibits transfers, without distinguishing between recipients that are in state or out of state. Is anybody aware of anything that clarifies the law at this time?