Quote Originally Posted by lowbeyond View Post
18-3-106 / 205 deal with vehicular homicide/assault.

42-4-1301.1 is the Expressed Consent Bull Shit

So IOW. If you do not consent to blowing, in effect to give the State evidence, or if you just refuse on principle , or for whatever reason. The State says you are a Persistent Drunk Driver

Why? Because Fuck you that's why. So it is WRITTEN, So it SHALL BE ! The Holy Book of the State is Final. If you have nothing to hide. Blah Blah. People love this shit. If it can save one life.. yadda yadda

Quite frankly, you should refuse everything. From stand on one leg, follow the light, chew gum and rub your belly, recite the pledge of allegiance in Klingon, whatever other idiotic thing they come up with. And refuse to blow.

Then just drive. Whatever.

Why on earth should you be forced to give them evidence? What ever happened to the right against self-incrimination. Oh yea.. We erased that one. Why. Because we (the State) have the guns, and are more willing to use them. IOW FU now hand over your $ ! Oh and BTW, now we will require you to buy this interlock thing from our buddy who happens to sell them.

Fascism at its finest - all under the color of Law. Congrats !
The statute states: "(68.5) (a) "Persistent drunk driver" means any person who:
(I) Has been convicted of or had his or her driver's license revoked for two or more alcohol-related driving violations;"

Which means if you are not a two time DUI/DWI-Alcohol related violator then the statute cannot be used against you. There is no "or" after the clause, therefore is a requirement to be met before the other clauses can be invoked. This statute is after the habitual alcoholic driver.