Oh FFS stupid people smoking pot could burn down the Black Forest and then where would Obama be?
It would seem to me like there is an awful lot of conjecture on here without knowing a whole lot of facts behind all this. First off, no, I don't know all the facts, but in what has been released to the public in regard to what the DEA, DOR (State, not federal), DPD and other local LE agencies around the effected areas where these raids took place- it has less to do with the conflict between Federal Drug Policy and A-64/MMJ, and more to do with these businesses were in some way or form in violation of regulatory measures (ie illegal sales, underage sales, etc) or other state statutes. New drug laws have been put in place as of 7/1/13 and something tells me that this is the first enforcement of such statutes. It wouldn't surprise me if more details are released later. It also wouldn't surprise me if there are more of these raids coming in the near future, cracking down on those doing business outside the limits of what the laws (more to come) state.
"There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
"The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."
Police dogs only have success rate of about 20% in detecting anything anyway. Their success rate is extremely exagerated much like polygraph tests and in many locations not admisable in court. Most hits by police dogs are planted hits where the dog knows it is supposed to alert based on a cue by the handler.
sent from a soup can and some string..
I'm not 100% sure on that, but it would seem that kind of accusation is an attack on K-9 Officers' integrity and professionalism... which I would see more as rare- the vast majority of police are honest and have the integrity to not make up evidence. I wouldn't go nearly as far as to say "most" alerts by drug-sniffing K9s are planted based on cues by the handler. That's like saying "most vehicle searches are preformed on false pretenses by dishonest cops" which is simply not true. As far as evidence obtained by drug dogs- the SCOTUS ruled it's admissible in court- Florida V. Harris where "Justice Elena Kagan stated that the dog's certification and continued training are adequate indication of his reliability, and thus is sufficient to presume the dog's alert provides probable cause to search, using the "totality-of-the-circumstances" test per Illinois v. Gates." A decision made Feb 19, 2013.
"There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
"The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."
Its a joke and you are taking my posts way too seriously!
Last edited by BushMasterBoy; 11-22-2013 at 22:56.
Just use the ignore function, it works really good!
Last edited by BushMasterBoy; 11-22-2013 at 23:27.