RUFKM? Judge orders Colorado Cake Maker to serve gay couples

[StagLefty]

Seems some of the older members think they are better than the newer members just because they happened upon a website 1st.

That's profiling

[hurley842002]

Seems some of the older members think they are better than the newer members just because they happened upon a website 1st.

Pretty sure that's not the reason why..... By the way, why'd you leave out the rest of Jim's post? That pretty clearly addresses Jim's issue with newer posters.....

[Irving]

This thread is gay. I'm going to get a judge to order that I not read it.

[MarkCO]

This thread is gay. I'm going to get a judge to order that I not read it.

How about just a patch. Then you can read only the "left" or the "right" side.

[Great-Kazoo]

Pretty sure that's not the reason why..... By the way, why'd you leave out the rest of Jim's post? That pretty clearly addresses Jim's issue with newer posters.....

because then they would have to address the actual issue. Once more deflecting away from the subject at hand. it's what i refer to a victim mentality. Though not necessarily in this case, just a typical deflecting away from the topic .

[brutal]

You need rainbow colored glasses to see all sides.

[ChuckNorris]

Gay or not gay - the guy has a right as a private business owner to decide with whom he may or may not do business with, without the courts sticking their noses into it!

I am sick of the government / court system telling everyone what they can or cannot do because THEY say so!

[PugnacAutMortem]

Pretty sure that's not the reason why..... By the way, why'd you leave out the rest of Jim's post? That pretty clearly addresses Jim's issue with newer posters.....

Jim doesn't write in intelligible sentences, so it was just easier to leave all of it out than try to explain to him what was wrong about his post.

[RblDiver]

There was a great guest on the Mandy Connell show this morning (well, guest host, but that time block). He said he was a gay man and he and his partner had gone to that same baker for a cake for their wedding. He said the baker didn't say no, but that he was very clearly uncomfortable with the whole situation, thus the two partners went elsewhere. The guest was saying, why would you even want to support someone who didn't agree with your beliefs? He thought the whole issue was just a case of the gays bullying the baker. He had a similar experience at a flower shop and some of the venues they wanted to use, but when they were turned down/saw the discomfort level, they didn't sue the establishments, they went to someone who wanted their business!

That guest had a lot of good common sense.

[BPTactical]

There was a great guest on the Mandy Connell show this morning (well, guest host, but that time block). He said he was a gay man and he and his partner had gone to that same baker for a cake for their wedding. He said the baker didn't say no, but that he was very clearly uncomfortable with the whole situation, thus the two partners went elsewhere. The guest was saying, why would you even want to support someone who didn't agree with your beliefs? He thought the whole issue was just a case of the gays bullying the baker. He had a similar experience at a flower shop and some of the venues they wanted to use, but when they were turned down/saw the discomfort level, they didn't sue the establishments, they went to someone who wanted their business!

That guest had a lot of good common sense.

And this is the way it should be.
I also heard that the couple in question were actually married in Massachusetts some time before this occurred.
Hmm, a gay couple from Massachusetts coming to Colorado not long after civil unions were approved looking for a "wedding" cake.
They knew just what they were doing, an "activist" couple looking to stir the pot.
Despicable.