RUFKM? Judge orders Colorado Cake Maker to serve gay couples

[Great-Kazoo]

In case some missed the ruling and it wasn't clarified in this thread, here's the crib notes.


It's a one time ruling based on state law as it existed at the time

It was / is a case where the "couple" shopped for a baker they could challenge.

It was also a decision based on the CO Civil rights commission's blatant discriminatory actions towards the baker.

[Rucker61]

In case some missed the ruling and it wasn't clarified in this thread, here's the crib notes.


It's a one time ruling based on state law as it existed at the time

It was / is a case where the "couple" shopped for a baker they could challenge.

It was also a decision based on the CO Civil rights commission's blatant discriminatory actions towards the baker.

^^This.

[Erni]

In case some missed the ruling and it wasn't clarified in this thread, here's the crib notes.


..........

It was also a decision based on the CO Civil rights commission's blatant discriminatory actions towards the baker.

Guys business was ruined. Anyone know if he will have recourse agsinst the commision or the members?

[68Charger]

Hahaha, setting aside the seriousness of this case - so much this. And it was one of my first thoughts years ago when this all started brewing.
Personally, I’m extremely polite to waiters, servers, and such so I don’t get a spit special!

Double Bac-o cheese, anyone? Large Farva?

I doubt they ever had any intention of eating the cake... this was never about cake.

Guys business was ruined. Anyone know if he will have recourse agsinst the commision or the members?

Would seem like that door is open... when 7 supreme court justices say you were discriminated against.

Freedom of speech should include the right to NOT say something you don't want to.

[Jeffrey Lebowski]

still couldn't keep the ridiculous, emotionally driven posts under control.

That was what was made it so difficult to read. It was this constant lurching back and forth between emotions with this generic desire to rally with no actual call to action (which I certainly would have rejected). Every little thing was this major tragedy, almost as if the super ego was completely lacking.

I doubt they ever had any intention of eating the cake... this was never about cake.

Of course it wasn’t, but my point remains, as others have said as well. I guess I understand not doing business with someone who doesn’t want to do it with me.

[Vic Tory]

Well summarized.

In case some missed the ruling and it wasn't clarified in this thread, here's the crib notes.


It's a one time ruling based on state law as it existed at the time

It was / is a case where the "couple" shopped for a baker they could challenge.

It was also a decision based on the CO Civil rights commission's blatant discriminatory actions towards the baker.