Goddamnit, Maverick...
Goddamnit, Maverick...
Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...
Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?
You got that right. That's why every rebellious area in the world features these things with a old 60, DSHK or some other MG mounted in the back. There were rumours that they would get introduced here, but I never was able to confirm anything. I think Canada imported a few though.
I like how your F-4 cockpit shot is from a video game. Best guess would be Wings Over Europe
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." Sir Winston Churchill
“It is well for that citizenry of nation are not understand banking and money system, if they are, I believe there would be revolution before Tuesday morning.” Henry Ford
My feedback: http://www.ar-15.co/threads/33234-lt-MADDOG-gt
F-4's didn't quite have the heaviest airframe ever.
Thud 27.5k empty-- although technically a light bomber
Phantom 30k empty
F-22 Raptor 43k empty 83.5k gross
Gross maximum take off weight and the Phantom was still heavier 52.5k vs 61.8k.
Even the F-14 weighed 40k empty 61k gross
If you want to include fighter bombers-- F-111 46k empty 91.5k gross
Starts to make the phantom look steam-lined and slim, eh?
Heaviest fighter ever fielded.. Tu-28 Fiddler, 54k empty 96k gross
What is the lightest modern fighter now flying?
I don't include the F-5's as modern... and is the F-16 really considered modern these days?
Really the only modern light weights are the Saab JAS39 Gripen 12.6k empty and the Taiwan F-CK-1 Ching-kuo 14.3k empty
Last edited by Colorado Osprey; 12-10-2013 at 06:03.
I say lets all remove the warning labels and let nature take its course.
When I was a kid, I was driving on my learners' permit on a family vacation trip from Portland, OR to Northern CA. I was heading down I-5 and a pair of F-4s came tearing over the coastal side mountains, across the highway in front of me, and back over the mountains on the eastern side of the valley. They were terrain following at low altitude. The only response I could come up with was, "Allright. I didn't expect that."
The F-4 was like an anti-stealth fighter. Picking up the black exhaust gas made visual detection pretty easy.
I still like fighters built to dogfight. Putting a gun on the F-4 was an afterthought. Today seems to be more like Nintendo-warfare -- point, click and ship beyond visual range.
Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
-Me
I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
-Also Me
Your right about that. The days of a swarming fishbowl are over. Stealth and missile technology have made Beyond Visual Range Shots the norm now. In my opinion we spend too much money on some of these programs. We've spent $68 billion dollars on 188 F-22 aircraft. Way too few to shift any global balance of power and it's just a stopgap for the F-35. This is why I love the older planes. P-51's to F-8's. Hell, my favorite plane is the A-1 Skyraider. Raw power, stick and rudder.
The pilot (according to the article I first read on it) was Lt. Col. Kevin "Showtime" Sutterfield. Clearly a man with a sense of panache.
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2...ran-coast.html
Mick-Boy
"Men who carry rifles for a living do not seek reward outside the guild. The most cherished gift...is a nod from his peers."
nsrconsulting.net