Still trying to understand that thought of anonymity on the Internet with Feds being involved? Then the 13K post to 7 posts panties in a twist when Jim is not attacking in the first place......
I am getting a troll feeling from this.![]()
Still trying to understand that thought of anonymity on the Internet with Feds being involved? Then the 13K post to 7 posts panties in a twist when Jim is not attacking in the first place......
I am getting a troll feeling from this.![]()
Last edited by Hound; 12-20-2013 at 00:36.
My life working is only preparation for my life as a hermit.
Feedback https://www.ar-15.co/threads/99005-Hound
Please not the same Samurai and no relation to me![]()
Armageddon was yesterday, today we have a real problem.
Despite what your momma told you violence does solve problems-The Craft
get out of Douglas and move to Jeffco. Unknown to my wife this is why we live Arvada.
And I appreciated the ones that were relevant to the thread
I will try to explain this again, going to a person whom I do not know if they will sign off on the form or not presents them with the option to be able to record my information and deny the form. I have no problem giving it to the NFA and as you said that is a federal registry, however, they WILL approve the form so I do not have to worry about giving my personal info/serial numbers to someone who would deny the form and use it against me. It is purely a privacy thing. That is what I was trying to say.
This does not contradict what I just stated above to your other point. What I am saying about anonymity of the internet is that my gun information is not attainable. Not a single person on here can tell me what guns I own, if I own suppressors/AOW/SBR/SBS or anything of that nature, to include serial numbers, or the name of an LLC. If you can attain that information based on my posts here, please do.
In short, the primary reason I got defensive was for the fact that I am on many many gun forums and I strongly dislike when a member with a high post count talks down to the new little guy, because his post count somehow makes him superior to the new person. Clearly that is what the others that posted here think, in my mind it doesn't, respect is earned not given and clearly you have earned those guys respect, which is great. The way that some of the others have been replying are not different then when you go to the gun store and talk to the one guy behind the counter who is the ultimate armchair commando and talks down to you because you ask him a question about a gun. I hate that elitist bullshit, so didn't feel like tolerating it. In these times you would think us gun owners would want to stick together and not try to separate the veterans from the N00bs...Believe me I have quite the extensive knowledge about many types of firearms and NFA items...
But I have no problem admitting that i did not call around to judges and DA's in the state simply because Weaver denied all of my forms. I decided the smart thing to do was make an LLC, so that is exactly what I did, now nobody but the NFA and I know what I own. Weaver is a fool...
Correct, it couldn't effect prior purchases. But what you're referring to is if the option for LLC/Trust becomes necessary to receive CLEO signature, then you'd be in a spot where you'd need it for new purchases. In which case you'll need to do one of three things.
1. Go without new purchase NFA items
2. Move to a more NFA friendly county
3. Find a chief in a different branch of LE to sign off that is acceptable to NFA regs. Clearly your Sheriff is out on that one (at least this guy) so you'll have to explore those other options. I'd start by making phone calls using hypothetical questions, ie no specifics. Call or email their offices and ask if they are willing to sign off on the paperwork, worst thing they can say is no.
Also, if one is willing, and has the authority, to sign off on it, the others can't do jack squat about it, no matter if they have all your info or not. After the fact it's a moot point because the BATFE has all the info on it anyway.