[MODS: Searched for some keywords and dates to see if this had been posed already. Please delete this if it has]
Came across this article, regarding a potential "loophole" in the GCA.
The argument is based on the term "person" not being broadly defined in the GCA (like it is in the NFA) to include trusts etc.
Let me know what you think ...
SHORT VERSION: http://bearingarms.com/great-time-bu...ew-mgs-trusts/
LONG VERSION: http://blog.princelaw.com/2014/05/14...ns-for-trusts/





Reply With Quote
