Co Dem introduces a bill defending 2nd amendment rights.

[ray1970]

Its a step in the right direction and a reflection of battles won. I don't think people should lose their rights for pot. But I also don't think people should lose their 2nd amendment rights for anything but a murder conviction. The gov gives out felonies for everything now and with it strips away the rights of millions forever.

Fine. I'll just say it. You're an idiot.

[ben4372]

The gov gives out felonies for everything now and with it strips away the rights of millions forever.

credit where credit is do. He got this one right.

[Jumpstart]

"right which has been expressly denied by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms for nearly two years." BATF is a law enforcement entity NOT a legislative entity. Who gave the BATF the authority to deny RIGHTS in the first place? That is for legislative bodies to decide. BATF is out of bounds..... again.

[TAR31]

While I don't think Polis is perfect, I think it is good to praise someone for doing something good. Polis just introduced a bill to restore 2nd Amendment rights to medical marijuana users. Regardless of the debate about drugs, I think it is good to lift restrictions on the rights to bare arms.



http://www.guns.com/2013/12/27/bill-...irearms-video/

Yeah, lets praise this guy for being a typical full of shit politician. Are you really so ignorant that you believe dems wont sell out your 2a rights the first time their party tells them to?

[nynco]

Yeah, lets praise this guy for being a typical full of shit politician. Are you really so ignorant that you believe dems wont sell out your 2a rights the first time their party tells them to?

My overall goal is to make 2nd Amendment rights a bi partisan issue. When that happens, then we won. Till then fight those who are against those and give praise when someone does the right thing. If 2nd Amendments rights stay as GOP thing alone then you are only one election away from losing them and the pendulum no matter how much you try will always go back and forth on those two crappy parties.

[osok-308]

My overall goal is to make 2nd Amendment rights a bi partisan issue. When that happens, then we won. Till then fight those who are against those and give praise when someone does the right thing. If 2nd Amendments rights stay as GOP thing alone then you are only one election away from losing them and the pendulum no matter how much you try will always go back and forth on those two crappy parties.

FALSE. The goal is to make the 2nd amendment not a political issue at all. It should not be a matter of left vs right at all. The goal is to make it akin to the 4th amendment or even the 1st where there is no debate on the amendment at all. Much like how people say "i may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death the right to say it". There should also be people who say "I may disagree with you feeling that you need to protect your family with a gun, but I will defend to the death your right to do it." Until this right is embraced by all to the point that it is not a political issue, but rather a freedom issue, then we will continue to vote for the lesser of two evils.

[hurley842002]

FALSE. The goal is to make the 2nd amendment not a political issue at all. It should not be a matter of left vs right at all. The goal is to make it akin to the 4th amendment or even the 1st where there is no debate on the amendment at all. Much like how people say "i may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death the right to say it". There should also be people who say "I may disagree with you feeling that you need to protect your family with a gun, but I will defend to the death your right to do it." Until this right is embraced by all to the point that it is not a political issue, but rather a freedom issue, then we will continue to vote for the lesser of two evils.

WIN!

[nynco]

FALSE. The goal is to make the 2nd amendment not a political issue at all. It should not be a matter of left vs right at all. The goal is to make it akin to the 4th amendment or even the 1st where there is no debate on the amendment at all. Much like how people say "i may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death the right to say it". There should also be people who say "I may disagree with you feeling that you need to protect your family with a gun, but I will defend to the death your right to do it." Until this right is embraced by all to the point that it is not a political issue, but rather a freedom issue, then we will continue to vote for the lesser of two evils.

I think we are saying the same thing here.

[screagle2]

Yeah, lets praise this guy for being a typical full of shit politician. Are you really so ignorant that you believe dems wont sell out your 2a rights the first time their party tells them to?

This^. He is VERY MUCH a proponent of the laws that were passed last year, and would like to see them nationally, at a minimum. He was very clear on this during discussions.

[Jesus-With-A-.45]

I hope polis gets sodomized by a nail gun.