Close
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    Gong Shooter Punkface's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Brighton, CO
    Posts
    386

    Default NY Judge Rules Against 7 Round Magazine Limit


  2. #2
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch
    Posts
    1,947

    Default

    But upheld the other silliness. Not a win for gun ownership!!

  3. #3
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Westminster, CO
    Posts
    2,741

    Default

    Makes you wonder about other conservative appointed judges and how they will rule on similar cases.

  4. #4
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,914

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric P View Post
    But upheld the other silliness. Not a win for gun ownership!!
    Yup.



    Only hope is SCOTUS remembers Heller where a class of firearm may not be banned.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  5. #5
    High Power Shooter Rabid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Centennial
    Posts
    967

    Default

    He only rejected the part about 7 rounds being loaded in a 10 round magazine. They are still at a 10 round limit.
    A lot more info in this article http://www.buffalonews.com/city-regi...e-act-20131231

  6. #6
    Smeghead - ACE Rimmer ChadAmberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    1,859

    Default

    Between this and the NSA is allowed to put cameras in your toilet* because terrorists!!1!!1! ruling recently, it's been pretty sad.

    * I know, a little hyperbole. But just wait...
    Shot Works Pro... It's better than scrap paper!!!
    You can use the discount code 'Take5' for 5 bucks off.

  7. #7
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric P View Post
    But upheld the other silliness. Not a win for gun ownership!!
    My thoughts as well.

    I would like to see, for once, a judge with integrity decide these issues on the basis of black-letter law and not subjective policy.

    This judge said that some limit was okay, but the seven round limit was not okay. Well... Then what is the limit according to law? How many rounds does it take before you cross the SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED standard set by 2A?

    Miller v. US settled this plain and simple. If a weapon was in common use, or used in the military, it was protected by 2A. 30 round standard cap AR mags are in common use and issued in the MIL. They are part of weapons system that determine the weapons capability and lethality. Making a weapon less lethal is an infringement.

    Why can't Miller ever be part of the consideration?

    Is it that acknowledging Miller means a judge would be acknowledging that 2A is actually about balancing the power of the government and has jack shit to do with hunting?

  8. #8
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Castle Rock, Colorado
    Posts
    728

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skip View Post
    M
    How many rounds does it take before you cross the SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED standard set by 2A?nting?
    From listening to liberal anti-gun types in the past, they are convinced that as long as you have a single shot .22 and are only allowed to possess one bullet at a time, they are doing you and the 2A a huge favor. This is what people mean when they say they support 2A and then follow that up with "BUT"...

  9. #9
    Recognized as needing a lap dance
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SW Missouri
    Posts
    5,540

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChadAmberg View Post
    Between this and the NSA is allowed to put cameras in your toilet* because terrorists!!1!!1! ruling recently, it's been pretty sad.

    * I know, a little hyperbole. But just wait...
    The NSA would be very upset and sad if they put a camera in my toilet. I make toilets cry.

  10. #10
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KevDen2005 View Post
    The NSA would be very upset and sad if they put a camera in my toilet. I make toilets cry.
    I guess it depends what they are into...
    "There are no finger prints under water."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •